🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:10:58 UTC No. 16117623
Einstein's theory of general relativity laid the groundwork for the concept of white holes. However, there's no record of him directly discussing them.
General relativity predicts white holes. The math behind his theory allows for solutions that describe these mirrored versions of black holes.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:16:49 UTC No. 16117629
>>16117623
Something not violating physics and something able to naturally or unnaturally occur aren't the same thing. Kugelblitzes don't violate physics, but they sure as fuck don't exist.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:22:24 UTC No. 16117644
>>16117629
I got news for you. Something violating physics can occur and it does occur.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:23:43 UTC No. 16117648
>>16117623
>The math allows
well there's your problem
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:31:35 UTC No. 16117659
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:34:06 UTC No. 16117664
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:31:32 UTC No. 16117798
>>16117623
>laid the groundwork for the concept of white holes
I'd like to lay my groundwork in a white hole if you catch my drift...
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:46:10 UTC No. 16117943
>>16117644
That wouldn't contradict anything I said.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 04:56:23 UTC No. 16118055
>>16117629
>Kugelblitzes don't violate physics, but they sure as fuck don't exist.
proof that they dont?