Image not available

1338x1528

NOAA xweet.jpg

๐Ÿงต NOAA now asserts that global warming is fake news

Anonymous No. 16117641

NOAA admits that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and has no effect on the climate. According to NOAA:
>The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around
>4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today,
>the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, &
>large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra.
Which is to say that even though CO2 is the same now as it was 4.3 million years ago, the climate today is far, far different and much colder than it was 4.3 million years ago and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate. Its also worth noting that atmospheric CO2 levels have been substantially above where they have been in the recent past for over 100 years now and there has been no substantial change in the climate during that time, which only further proves NOAA's assertion that CO2 doesn't affect the Earth's climate and that CO2 is not a meaningful greenhouse gas.

Image not available

202x360

hexagonal packing.webm

Anonymous No. 16117656

Cool, here's a cookie wizard.

Anonymous No. 16117761

>>16117641
>He doesn't know what hysteresis is and thinks everything always happens immediately
You are legit a retard.

Anonymous No. 16117956

>>16117761
Course I know what a hysterisis is it's when my mom starts saying crazy stuff after I stayed out "too late" on a weekday.

Anonymous No. 16118180

>>16117641
As a midwit my take on climate change has always been that it is fake and ghey soley because trees need C02, simple asโ€ฆ

Image not available

960x720

co2 is good for t....jpg

Anonymous No. 16118479

>>16118180
Not only do plants absorb CO2, but they also absorb solar energy and transform it into physical mass rather than reemitting it at a lower frequency. This process increases exponentially as the atmospheric CO2 levels increase because plants are 3 dimensional objects, so when CO2 levels increase the plants' growth rates grow in 3 dimensions, doubling CO2 makes plants add mass 8x faster, however eventually they start blocking out each others' sunlight so the process can't really grow like that forever

Anonymous No. 16119328

>>16118180
>>16118479
Retard takes

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16119988

>>16119328
you're just too low iq to understand it

Anonymous No. 16120075

>>16119988
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16120521

>>16120075
you're too low IQ to understand science, sorry of that upsets you so much

Anonymous No. 16120857

>>16120521
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16121440

>>16120857
>t. retard

Anonymous No. 16121550

>>16121440
>the color red is actually green
>you're just too low iq to understand it

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16122037

>>16117761
You'd be able to calculate the time frames involved yourself if you'd ever passed freshmen level thermodynamics, which you clearly haven't

Anonymous No. 16122104

>>16117656
wtf is this real

Anonymous No. 16122300

>>16122037
Cope harder.

Anonymous No. 16122697

>>16117641
>anon doesn't understand what time is

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16123285

>>16118479
The more CO2 there is in the atmosphere, the faster and more efficiently plant sequester solar radiation. Thats why adding CO2 to the atmosphere causes global cooling

Anonymous No. 16123513

>>16123285
Lol no.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16123865

>>16123285
Thats probably how ice ages get started

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16125098

>>16117641
How come sea level isn't 75' higher? Because CO2 has no influence on climate?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16126288

>>16125098
correct, if CO2 had any significant influence on the climate then sea levels would be rising massively. instead they aren't rising at all.

Image not available

822x351

sea level going d....jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16126819

>>16126288
Sea level is actually falling measurably in a lot of locations

Anonymous No. 16126826

Nah globohomo is flipping the script cause they realized threatening people with fear will make them want to kill millionaires rather than stop grilling
Boooooo bad play, I wanted TMD

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16126830

>>16126826
>I'm jealous of everyone who has more money than me
Let me guess, everyone who has less money than you is a worthless lazy bum and deserves to be genocided just as much as everyone with more money than you does and of course you're a perfect special snowflake

Anonymous No. 16126831

>>16125098
>>16126288
Where would all that water come from? Do the math.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16127949

>>16118479
Thats why burning hydrocarbon fuels couldn't possibly cause global warming. The energy stored in those fuels is stored solar energy, its not endemically of Earthly origin so releasing it sends it on it's way once again, delayed by a a few hundred million years or so

Anonymous No. 16128025

>>16127949
You are a moron. It's not heat from fossil fuels driving global warming, it's heat from the sun being trapped by the greenhouse gasses from fossil fuel emissions.

Image not available

1089x907

file.png

goes in all fields No. 16128461

>>16126819
>a variable is controlled by more than 1 factor
This confuses a contrarian

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16128603

>>16128025
>REEEEE!!!! YOUR DUM!!!!!
I can tell this is an emotional issue for you because of how you were driven to childish name calling, but there is no evidence that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and vast quantities of evidence which proves that it isn't a greenhouse gas

Anonymous No. 16128607

>>16118479
This is true. High CO2 means high growth for plants/trees.

Anonymous No. 16128609

>>16117641
if you turn up a heater in a room does the entire room heat up immediately?

Anonymous No. 16128620

>>16128603
I can tell you never pursued higher education because you failed to source your absurd claims.

Image not available

600x600

Liebigs-Law-of-Mi....png

Anonymous No. 16128623

>>16128607
No it doesn't.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16128632

Why did this t not read get massacred?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16129916

>>16128620
NOAA says that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas, its in OP

Anonymous No. 16130328

>>16129916
Incorrect.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16130854

>>16130328
NOAA admits that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and has no effect on the climate. According to NOAA:
>>The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere today is comparable to around
>>4.3 million years ago, when sea level was about 75 ft higher than today,
>>the average temp was 7 degrees F higher than in pre-industrial times, &
>>large forests occupied areas of the Arctic that are now tundra.
Which is to say that even though CO2 is the same now as it was 4.3 million years ago, the climate today is far, far different and much colder than it was 4.3 million years ago and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate. Its also worth noting that atmospheric CO2 levels have been substantially above where they have been in the recent past for over 100 years now and there has been no substantial change in the climate during that time, which only further proves NOAA's assertion that CO2 doesn't affect the Earth's climate and that CO2 is not a meaningful greenhouse gas.

Anonymous No. 16130867

>>16130854
Non sequitur. Why do you have to lie to try to prove your argument?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16132118

>>16117641
Its nice of them to finally admit it

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16132910

>>16128609
everywhere on the planet warms up during the day and cools off at night. if CO2 were a greenhouse gas then the reduced rate of cooling at night due to CO2 would be measurable. instead it still cools off at night, just as much as ever, because CO2 is not a greenhouse gas

Anonymous No. 16132913

>>16130867
A lie is not a non sequitur my nigger

Anonymous No. 16132917

>>16132913
It is in this case.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16134105

>>16117641
Thats quite a change, I wonder what it was that finally made them come around?

Anonymous No. 16134764

>>16117641
>and this is because atmospheric CO2 levels have no effect or undetectably little effect on the Earth's climate
no, it's not
this fucking board, sigh

Anonymous No. 16135203

>>16134764
>I hate /sci/
why are you here?

Anonymous No. 16136406

>>16132913
the n word is racist

Anonymous No. 16136884

>>16136406
That's whats so great about it

Anonymous No. 16136918

>>16128623
Yes it does. This is a well known and studied fact. Why is it under fire all of a sudden?

Anonymous No. 16137359

>>16136918
It never worked that way. You only thought it did because you are a retard who misunderstood what you were told.

https://www.cropnutrition.com/resource-library/the-law-of-the-minimum/

Image not available

944x720

white cat.png

Anonymous No. 16137400

>>16118479
>The only thing trees need is CO2. Clearly water and nutrients be damned.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16138535

>>16137359
CO2 makes plants grow better, why does that upset you so much? Do you hate plants and want them to die or something?

Anonymous No. 16138834

>>16138535
You are a moron who clearly either didn't read or didn't understand that link.

Anonymous No. 16139536

>>16138834
CO2 makes plants grow better, why does that upset you so much? Do you hate plants and want them to die or something?

Anonymous No. 16140082

>>16139536
You are a moron who clearly either didn't read or didn't understand that link.

Image not available

540x1006

enough of fucking....jpg

Anonymous No. 16140762

it knows...

Anonymous No. 16140763

>>16135203
>why are you here?
because among the crowd of retards, there are still other scientists here whom I learn things from.