๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:42:15 UTC No. 16117675
What is matter?
>Anything that has mass and occupies space
What is mass?
>It's just stuff bro
Why are scientists like this?
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:43:01 UTC No. 16117676
>>16117675
I look like this, and say what's in the greentext unironically.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Apr 2024 23:43:59 UTC No. 16117678
What is mass?
>In classical mechanics, the coefficient between force and acceleration.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 01:46:37 UTC No. 16117809
Underdeveloped metaphysics.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 03:07:49 UTC No. 16117910
>>16117675
Mass is an innate property of an object that is the ratio of acceleration it gets from a force applied to it
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 04:55:41 UTC No. 16118051
>>16117678
>>16117910
>Words words words
This doesn't mean anything.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:32:36 UTC No. 16118116
>>16117675
>What is matter?
Nothing. Then why am I pouting? You figure it out.
>What is mass?
They hide their inconsistencies by playing games. Matter / mass deliberately and deceptively invokes the idea of something solid / tangible. The problem is of course that particles are more fuzzy than the deliberate and deceptive idea of a marble. This is a threat to the worldview that there's a clear-cut difference between subject/object which of course dualism in atheist sauce.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:50:51 UTC No. 16118143
>>16118051
>This doesn't mean anything.
What is "mean"?
What is "anything"?
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 05:55:21 UTC No. 16118152
>>16117675
>occupies space
Based, electrons aren't real
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:02:15 UTC No. 16118156
>>16118143
>What is "mean"?
Meaning is synonymous with referring, pointing and symbolizing like the word tree points to something that we can see, touch and smell unlike:
>innate property of an object
>that is the ratio of acceleration
>it gets from a force
these words don't refer to something we can see, touch and smell.
>What is "anything"?
Sensory impressions.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:04:42 UTC No. 16118161
Mass is the accumulation of energy, energy is the entropy unleashed through time.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:25:00 UTC No. 16118175
>>16118161
>energy
I'm looking at a steak but I can't find the calories that the label says it should have. Can you point to the calories for me please? An idea must be verifiable by observation according to the scientific method.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:31:47 UTC No. 16118185
>>16118156
>words words words
That doesn't mean anything.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:35:05 UTC No. 16118187
>>16118175
>Can you point to the calories for me please
The steak itself, the molecular bonds that form the steak contain energy
>verifiable by observation
You can burn it inside a calorimeter and measure the energy
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 06:50:45 UTC No. 16118200
>>16118187
You're proving the point that energy is not a thing but a made-up unit of measurement for rate of change / things transforming into other things. There's no energy in a muscle: there's just a rate of exchanging glycogen and water for ATP, heat and CO2 and a measurement of movement: acceleration and speed of the objects that move with the muscle.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 07:11:08 UTC No. 16118227
>>16118200
>Energy is not a thing
>Energy is a unit of measurement
Make up your mind brainlet. Energy is entropy, the derivative of entropy at a single moment, you can only deny this if you don't think time or causality is a thing.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 07:26:38 UTC No. 16118250
>>16118200
This is like saying that space is the made up unit of measurement btn two points and that essentially makes it less of a thing than the two points you are measuring from.
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 23:12:26 UTC No. 16120026
>>16118051
If you don't want words, how would you like me to explain what mass is?
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:40:15 UTC No. 16120117
>>16120026
Geometrically