Image not available

657x680

V2p.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16117776

Does walking speed really correlate with IQ?

Image not available

584x856

1687411064616784.webm

Anonymous No. 16117791

>>16117776
>begin walking fast
>IQ suddenly rises by 10 points
>start walking slow
>IQ suddenly drops by 10 points

Anonymous No. 16117827

>>16117776
dear r so dum

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16117928

>>16117776
>I fitted a line to a circular data set
peer review unironically approves of this

Image not available

418x317

TIMESAND___8116ee....jpg

El Arcรณn No. 16117938

>>16117776
The best fit line shows correlation, but maybe I have the highest IQ of anyone on Earth, and I walk around 1.5 m/s, which looks like average to me. Maybe being busy correlates with walking faster and high IQ too, but being busy would be obviously causal toward walking more quickly in a way that correlation between walking speed and IQ isn't.
>people with more stuff to do walk faster?

Anonymous No. 16117953

I can absolutely guarantee you the average walking speed is not 3.5 miles per hour.
Maybe 2.2 miles per hour.

Not 1.5m/s.

Data source is suspect.

Anonymous No. 16117961

>>16117776
Theory:
The people who walk faster are the type of people to put more effort in
They also put more effort into their IQ tests

Anonymous No. 16118046

>>16117776
low iq = bbc = harder to walk

Anonymous No. 16118061

>>16117776
Yes but so does urbanism, gender, and a bunch of other things so donโ€™t conclude too much anon

Anonymous No. 16118073

>>16117791
can /sci/ explain how these things aren't extinct yet?

Image not available

810x276

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 16118077

>Here's your correlation bro
Is this what passes for science nowadays?

Anonymous No. 16118080

>>16118077
lol just shrink the x axis to make it more linear bro

Anonymous No. 16118107

Steven Hawking?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16118112

>>16118107
he was a midwit at best. no meaningful accomplishments in his entire career, spent his life on useless make-believe black hole junk and nobody ever called him out on it because of sympathy for sad wheelchair man.

Anonymous No. 16118206

Which online IQ test is best?

Anonymous No. 16118213

>>16117776
no
imbecil

Anonymous No. 16118329

>>16117776
Walking speed, talking speed, gaming proficiency etc.

Anonymous No. 16118357

>>16117776
itt buttblasted PoC

Anonymous No. 16118361

>>16117776
Definitely. I walk fast. My smart friends walk fast. But we're always stuck behind groups of fat sheboons walking at the speed of shit

DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk No. 16118366

>>16117938
>Maybe being busy correlates with walking faster and high IQ too
doubtful if they work any service job

Anonymous No. 16118368

>>16117776
Sonic fans typically have 180+ IQ so it seems likely.

Anonymous No. 16118408

>>16117791
Thought this was gonna cut to a /rekt/ as they stopped in the middle

Image not available

1080x2340

Screenshot_202404....png

Anonymous No. 16118504

>>16117776
Dumb people are more often
>fat
>poor
Than the clever people who tend to be more
>fit
>rich

Now ofc, there is this endless debate about the correlation VS causality. Were fat clever children so high iq they saw their own weakness and went to count calories until they were no longer fat? Or is being fat so bad you dont get enough blood into your brain which then arthopies to the point you no longer have ability to count calories anymore?

So walking speed is just another joke arbitrary measurement of human VS subhuman in a sense. Almost everything health related correlated with income and with iq and with skin tone...

>>16118073
they eat vegetables so they cannot really ever run out of food, they are capable of casually travelling hundreds of kilometers so they can dodge any serious ecological catastrophies, humans eliminated their natural predators (wolves) and they breed a lot with ease. It is fair to assume these will survive longer than humans unless we will go full hitler and shoot them all dead for political reasons.

Anonymous No. 16118519

>>16117776
Tell Professor Hawking that

Anonymous No. 16118554

>>16118519
he was a midwit at best. no meaningful accomplishments in his entire career, spent his life on useless make-believe black hole junk and nobody ever called him out on it because of sympathy for sad wheelchair man.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16120040

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6-SJLlneLc

Anonymous No. 16120215

>>16117776
Why do niggers walk so fucking slow? Can any niggers browsing this board tell me why?

Anonymous No. 16120227

>>16117776
While it's definitely there, that's a very mild correlation so if any of you are slow walkers I wouldn't worry about it.

Anonymous No. 16120261

>>16117928
>>16118077
The best fit line has a p < 0.001. Do you even know how significant that is? More stats should be taught in schools.

Image not available

1920x1080

1711296615282574.webm

Anonymous No. 16120269

>>16117776
Ayyy I'm walking 'ere

Anonymous No. 16120272

>>16120269
that animation is fake and gay

Image not available

352x276

squish&#039;d.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16121121

>>16118077
they stretched the x axis on those graphs to make the fits look reasonable, all you have to do to show how ridiculous the fits are is to squish that pic back to a normal scaling

Anonymous No. 16121355

longer dick, slower walk.
simple as that.

Anonymous No. 16121364

>>16117776
Literally none of the numbers in that chart are statistically significant, also the amount of confounding variables at play

Anonymous No. 16121368

>>16121364
But low P value doe

Anonymous No. 16121374

>>16117776
There's apparently a correlation between faster walking speed and health in general. Maybe it's as simple as a relation between a healthy body and an effective mind. Wouldn't surprise me.

Anonymous No. 16121382

>>16120261
https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/math/statistics/how-to-interpret-a-correlation-coefficient-r-169792/

Anonymous No. 16121508

>>16121368
yes, and?

Anonymous No. 16121527

Why do black retards walk so slow?