🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:32:15 UTC No. 16118732
>s-yd
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Apr 2024 22:30:44 UTC No. 16119943
How does normies appreciating science, albiet incorrectly and incompletely at best, damage you in any way?
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 9 Apr 2024 19:07:43 UTC No. 16121224
>Science is for smart people
>That means that if I try to associate my personality with science I can claim it means I'm unusually intelligent
Right and if I claim to like basketball that means I'm tall
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:21:41 UTC No. 16121794
>>16121224
lol
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:31:46 UTC No. 16121803
>>16121796
What are some science things that the degenerates and edge lords here would find cool but Reddit would downdoot?
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:33:06 UTC No. 16123011
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:10:46 UTC No. 16126278
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 07:18:41 UTC No. 16126899
>>16121803
racial IQ distributions
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 23:43:47 UTC No. 16127979
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 01:32:27 UTC No. 16129446
>>16118729
I like science
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 01:43:28 UTC No. 16129457
Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItB
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 04:25:34 UTC No. 16129595
>>16128700
>study may explain
>some argued
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Apr 2024 12:37:13 UTC No. 16130038
>>16119943
Didn't the last few years already answer this? Turning pop scientists into an infallible priest class, knowers of absolute truth in all things, is something that affects policies and public discourse and have an effect on all of us. It is especially sinister, since the system is set up in such a way that even real scientists are by no means independent and are entirely dependent on others for their funding and livelihood, i.e., heretical priests are trivially easy to discredit and get rid of.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:44:30 UTC No. 16130872
>>16130038
Kary Mullis was outright murdered just before the covid scam took place because they knew he would be outspoken about debunking their fraudulent abuse of PCR tests
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:23:52 UTC No. 16132911
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:25:34 UTC No. 16132912
>>16118729
every inch of it even if it’s delirium
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:33:35 UTC No. 16133618
>>16132911
What the hell did I just read?
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:26:03 UTC No. 16134295
>>16132911
real
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:52:11 UTC No. 16134567
>>16132130
Merry civilization collapse and happy abortions to you sir
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:34:39 UTC No. 16134629
>>16121803
Heritability of IQ and it's distribution among different human populations.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:19:50 UTC No. 16135545
>>16133618
high quality modern literature
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:34:14 UTC No. 16137933
>>16136634
Why are scyence faggots so notorious for being physically repulsive? Do they go through life presuming that they're too good to be held to the same standards as everyone else or something?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 10:29:58 UTC No. 16138633
>>16137933
>Do they go through life presuming that they're too good to be held to the same standards as everyone else or something?
people who don't exercise and are too lazy to have decent hygiene habits all universally love the "don't judge a book by it's cover" meme because that meme justifies their selfish unwillingness to be as clean and attractive as the people they lust after
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:54:53 UTC No. 16139604
>>16138633
Where do they get their outsized senses of entitlement from?
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:30:39 UTC No. 16140300
>>16137933
maladaptive traits cluster together
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:58:34 UTC No. 16141304
>>16136634
How does science explain that the most healthy, fit and mentally well people are the ones who ignore science?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:02:04 UTC No. 16142727
>>16141304
soiyence ignores uncomfortable realities like that
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:09:16 UTC No. 16142748
>>16138695
Rutherford chads won in the end.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:42:59 UTC No. 16142992
>>16119943
they are not rigorous and dilute fields with nonsense that becomes orthodoxy if there is a critical mass of such people.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:34:57 UTC No. 16143876
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:02:49 UTC No. 16144772
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 22:46:14 UTC No. 16145989
>>16134295
what'd i miss?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 06:30:32 UTC No. 16148061
>>16130038
>since the system is set up in such a way that even real scientists are by no means independent and are entirely dependent on others for their funding and livelihood,
And when they aren't, they're dealt with by other means, such as the assassination of Kary Mullis shortly before the start of the covid hoax, which relied of fake PCR testing to be convincing
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 06:34:38 UTC No. 16148065
>>16119943
"Science" gave me the ultimatum to either die by poorly tested gene therapy or die by starvation
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 06:45:51 UTC No. 16148072
>>16148065
You chose to be a lab rat, am I right?
Live by the science, die by the science.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:02:38 UTC No. 16148082
>>16148072
No, I chose to starve and spite the system
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:25:46 UTC No. 16148682
>>16119943
they're not damaging me in any way. yeah, until the fake sciences start to be implemented into social policies, start to be integrated into the health cares, the infrastructure systems, everything in life... etc
until they start to teach children nonsenses in K-12 and encourage themselves to chop their dick/tit off.
I wish I can just ignore the fake and fradulent sciences but that is not the case.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:32:21 UTC No. 16148687
>>16148682
>until the fake sciences start to be implemented into social policies, start to be integrated into the health cares, the infrastructure systems, everything in life... etc
scientists don't have that kind of power anon. politicians do. get real
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:39:43 UTC No. 16148690
>>16148687
>scientist
no, you're thinking this in the wrong way.
fraudulent sciences and politics are usually intertwined. the "scientists" that publish the most high profile, fradulent sciences are power money seeking, lying disgusting snakes and their fake sciences need to be called out. even if the fraud scientists don't have that much power their garbage can find its way into mainstream policies just because it fit a certain narratives considering how much of society is based on scientism nowadays.
fake and fraduluent science is a cancer that will infect everything in the system and need to be cleaned out before it is too late.
I'm afraid it's most likely have already been too late.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:50:00 UTC No. 16148700
Alert the Corps it's a "Heckin" hecking?
GoodLuck Science involved andor Science Enthusiasts
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:15:26 UTC No. 16148918
Is this thread o p a big slip? Of their org arms?
What is it (>>16118729)?
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 06:14:08 UTC No. 16149531
>>16148690
>their garbage can find its way into mainstream policies just because it fit a certain narratives
You have it backwards, their soiyence is developed with the intention of using it to shill narratives and justify the policies that their bosses want to implement.
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:36:00 UTC No. 16150898
>>16149531
AKA motivated reasoning
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:53:56 UTC No. 16153445
Anonymous at Wed, 1 May 2024 06:44:48 UTC No. 16154305
Anonymous at Wed, 1 May 2024 10:56:51 UTC No. 16154651
>>16118729
>OMG OMG IT'S LE BLACK HOLE!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 23:29:46 UTC No. 16157064
>>16134629
it goes deeper than iq into psychology too you know
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:43:39 UTC No. 16158121
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 07:29:34 UTC No. 16158661
>>16148061
That was the reward they gave Mullis for his contribution to science
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 02:40:46 UTC No. 16160029
>>16156935
>>16158121
i'm so sick of this grotesque shit, autistic people wouldn't tolerate this going into their eyes as often as happens here. same with those screaming blood faces on /biz/
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 19:38:56 UTC No. 16161134
>>16160029
>i'm so sick of this grotesque shit, autistic people wouldn't tolerate this going into their eyes as often as happens here. same with those screaming blood faces on /biz/
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 19:51:46 UTC No. 16161159
WTF is this "soi jack" anti science spam?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 16:10:18 UTC No. 16162426
>>16161159
>cartoon pics trigger me and make me cry
grow up
Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 16:13:02 UTC No. 16162427
>>16162426
You didnt have to bump this
Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 04:13:12 UTC No. 16163510
>>16121796
Gore posting a blue board
Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 17:57:47 UTC No. 16164266
>>16118729
this but unironically and without resentful vitriol.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 02:33:31 UTC No. 16165113
>>16164266
>this but unironically and without resentful vitriol.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 19:54:51 UTC No. 16166248
Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 04:35:15 UTC No. 16166832
Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 19:52:38 UTC No. 16167854
>>16166832
lol
Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 03:16:42 UTC No. 16168442
>>16161134
i don't even see how 'jaks are ""grotesque""
Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:43:47 UTC No. 16168583
>>16168442
More like redditesque. It's a soulless forced meme. The lowest form of internet "culture". It takes no effort to copypaste and repost this silly overused cartoon face - and this is why it has become unfunny and boring so quickly.
Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 21:36:59 UTC No. 16169703
>>16168583
>jaks trigger me
thanks for letting us all know
Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 21:58:53 UTC No. 16169723
I love science too! And it's pathetic how unintellectual some people are on this thread. You think you are better that Sagan? He was a real scientist you know. And pop science helps the spread of science.
Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 08:13:21 UTC No. 16170452
>>16169723
>He was a real scientist
no he wasn't, he was just a jewish tv clown, he was a failure in his attempt to do actual scientific work, his entire career amounted to nothing
Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 21:41:10 UTC No. 16171368
>>16170452
>he was a failure in his attempt to do actual scientific work, his entire career amounted to nothing
same is true of the token negro they replaced him with
Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 21:43:30 UTC No. 16171375
>>16169703
>*posts immature shit*
>"hey dude, you're immature af"
>hehehe tRiGgErED :DDDD
The average jack poster