Image not available

960x831

radical.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16122345

I want to do a simple experiment

What do you think this simplifies to?

Anonymous No. 16122347

>>16122345
It simplifies to me giving you a 0 and moving on to the next student

Anonymous No. 16122378

>>16122345
It doesnt simplify to anything because it's not standard mathematical notation.

Anonymous No. 16122414

>>16122378
This.

Anonymous No. 16122415

>>16122345
It's sqrt(64/17) which simplifies to 8/sqrt(17). I don't know how the fuck you got anything else. Use Wolfram alpha to confirm that you are a fucking retard.

Anonymous No. 16122417

>>16122415
Then my professor is wrong. thanks for confirming that for me :)

Anonymous No. 16122441

>>16122415
>>16122417
You are both very mistaken, because that fraction is ambiguous, which means the only correct interpretation of OP's image is "what the fuck do you mean".

Anonymous No. 16122450

>>16122345
poor syntax since one can't tell which fraction takes priority.
either one fraction bar should be wider than the other, or one fraction should be in brackets

Image not available

935x903

desu.jpg

Anonymous No. 16122453

PLEASE BE BAIT
>>16122345
>>16122378
>>16122415
>>16122417
>>16122450

Anonymous No. 16122470

>>16122453
lol

Anonymous No. 16122483

Personally i say 4sqrt(17)/17 but i'm also pretty leftbrained

Anonymous No. 16122493

6srqt(17)/17

Anonymous No. 16122659

>>16122441
>>16122450
>>16122453
Bottom of the bottom is the top. Dividing a fraction by two is the same as multiplying the numerator by two. You should be able to prove this with high school algebra. If you can't then you need to review and practice your fundamentals.

Anonymous No. 16122664

>>16122345
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=square+root+of+32%2F17%2F2

Anonymous No. 16122668

32/17/2 is to be read as (32/17)/2 and not as 32/(17/2), so it's 4sqrt(17)/17

Image not available

960x831

1693079823750995.png

Anonymous No. 16122715

>>16122345
easy

Anonymous No. 16122843

>>16122345
write it in a better notation, if the answer is ambiguous you've failed as the creator of the question

Anonymous No. 16122896

>>16122345
neither because the sqrt of 17 does not exist

Anonymous No. 16122901

>>16122415
>Use Wolfram alpha to confirm that you are a fucking retard.
To input this into Wolfram Alpha requires making a choice of how to parse the ambiguous fraction. So it confirms nothing.

Image not available

960x831

Untitled.png

Anonymous No. 16122949

It's sqrt(32/(17/2)). It's difficult but not impossible to parse.

That simplifies to 8โˆš(17)/17.

Were the bars the exact same width, there would be a problem, but they aren't.

Anonymous No. 16122979

>>16122949
if only I pointed it out 4 posts above yours

Anonymous No. 16122989

>>16122979
You showed your work but forgot to fill in an answer.

Anonymous No. 16122994

>>16122989
it was left for the reader as an exercise

Anonymous No. 16123038

>>16122345
why are the mathematically illiterate so intrigued by order of operation conventions?

Anonymous No. 16123055

>>16123038
Because to the mathematically illiterate, it looks like a hole in our understanding of math that is simple enough that they can contribute to it.

Image not available

1305x156

math.png

Anonymous No. 16123295

Bitches can't tell 32/17โ„2 from 32โ„17/2.

Garrote No. 16123303

Division is not associative but you give no clear indication of precedence.

Image not available

828x714

1681424117533719.jpg

Anonymous No. 16123355

>>16122345
Who cares? Nobody writes a fraction like that without at least making one fraction line smaller or using some parentheses
What does
>1++2-*5
equal? That's right, nobody cares because it's fucking gibberiish. Retard.

Anonymous No. 16123371

>>16122715
>>16122949
>OP does some shitty MS paint lines
>OMG guysss it means something

Anonymous No. 16123462

>>16123371
>>OMG guysss it means something
It literally does though? As written it can be mathematically interpreted.

I'm not speaking on the intent of the creator, but of the lines themselves.