Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:36:32 UTC No. 16122683

Don't care what you believe. It is what it is. What would believing it is/isn't a coincidence change?
Is that going to make you believe in God or something? If so, REALLY? That was the proof you needed? Why?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:48:47 UTC No. 16122710

>>16122678
>We're supposed to believe this is all a perfectly proportioned coincidence?
Obviously. What else could it possibly be? Do you think a Shaman cast a spell on the moon to change its distance?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:15:54 UTC No. 16122745

>>16122678
most solar eclipses aren't even total, they are partial. and the distance between the sun and moon and the earth and moon is constantly changing. the only true "~ 400x" number is the diameters of the sun and moon, the rest are averages and even then it's not exactly 400. why are you so retarded and gullible? go back to facebook

explain this solar eclipse OP. you said the sun and moon were precisely proportioned?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:16:56 UTC No. 16122748

Why would you believe otherwise? Its a weird proportion to fixate on.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:17:24 UTC No. 16122751

>>16122678
Isn't the proportionality argument wrong and the moon would hide completly the sun and it is actually a relativistic phenomenon?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:17:41 UTC No. 16122753

okay now do the same for every moon of jupiter

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:17:56 UTC No. 16122755

>Just chop off all the sig figs and round and it matches exactly!!!
God probably meant to make it exact, and was just bad at measuring. Is that what Christfags believe?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:27:01 UTC No. 16122773

>>16122678
it's not perfect tho ("400" instead of 400.000), and the Moon-Earth distance isn't constant...

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:29:54 UTC No. 16122778

>>16122678
Its not perfect, the distance varies...

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:42:17 UTC No. 16122790

>>16122753
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HVHac2DZ7l8OgFlAlSa6mkvKUTNQnA4UxTRMdy90iDY/
neptune's hippocamp confirmed God's second chosen satellite

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:52:12 UTC No. 16122806

>Perigee
>356400–370400 km
>Apogee
>404000–406700 km
A range of 356400-406700 km means the ratio of Earth-Moon Earth-Sun lies between 367.8 and 419.7, hardly the "oh my god it's so le specific and le special". Even worse when you consider the Moon drifting away from Earth.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:54:14 UTC No. 16122810

>>16122806
You just ruined his schizo enjoyment.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:56:29 UTC No. 16122814

>>16122678
When you actually start looking at the rest of space you’ll realize that the earth and how it’s set up is pretty fucking rare

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:03:55 UTC No. 16122835

>>16122678
The Moon is drifting towards the Sun and has been since its creation. One day there will be a total solar eclipse visible from Earth that ends up being the Moon's going away party. The coincidence is us, being alive while the Moon orbits just so that it's not too close to block the corona but not too far to always be annular.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:05:52 UTC No. 16122840

>>16122814
If life can only exist on a rare specific type of planet the rarity of that planet means nothing to its inhabitants

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:14:38 UTC No. 16122857

>>16122814
It probably is rare, but it's not like we've explored much of the universe. I heard someone use a metaphor once that concluding there's no other life would be like pulling a bucket of water out of the ocean and concluding there aren't any whales.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:27:33 UTC No. 16122880

>>16122678
yes

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:41:59 UTC No. 16122909

>>16122790
Your stupid effortpost is greatly appreciated, anon.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:48:22 UTC No. 16123041

Solar eclipses would be better if the moon was a bit closer to earth. That way we wouldn’t have annular eclipses and totality would last longer.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:03:02 UTC No. 16123073

>>16122678
>perfectly proportioned
>perfectly
That's entirely subjective. I happen to think those are trash proportions.