Image not available

1191x417

Untitled.png

๐Ÿงต can this work?

Anonymous No. 16124589

can i stop spinning weights in space at the right time to move a spacecraft?

Anonymous No. 16124595

>>16124589
Yeah, read about how the Hubble Space Telescope uses rotating weights to move.
https://science.nasa.gov/mission/hubble/observatory/design/pointing-control

Anonymous No. 16124596

but muh conservation of angular momentum
you'll just make the ship start spinning

Anonymous No. 16124606

>>16124595
wow cool i thought it was just used for rotating things but not moving linearly

though it seems that the velocity is capped? i thought itd be possible to accelerate to high speeds

Anonymous No. 16124611

>>16124596
in which direction would it spin? i thought if id take two spinning weights and made them spin in opposite directions like in the OP pic it would cancel out the spin

Anonymous No. 16125023

>>16124606
>i thought itd be possible to accelerate to high speeds
Fucking nope.

Anonymous No. 16125088

>>>/sci/sfg/

Anonymous No. 16125094

>>16124606
you need to "grab" on something to move through space. atm we grab on matter and throw it the opposite side of where we want to go to. not loosing mass for deltaV would be a gamechanger.

Image not available

1280x720

big-rig-racing-vi....jpg

Anonymous No. 16125156

They called me crazy as I claimed the rig will lean on the right as the engine spins another direction. Who was in wrong here?

Anonymous No. 16125421

>>16125094
but how does the hubble move linearly then? it seems that if one rotates some aligned flywheels just the right way, then angular momentum becomes linear momentum, or am I still misunderstanding something? where do we grab here, and what do we throw to the opposite side?

Anonymous No. 16125424

>>16125421
>>16125156

Anonymous No. 16125512

>>16124606
it works for rotation but not for translatory motion

Anonymous No. 16125559

>>16125156
>engine spin
you mean the crank shaft?

Anonymous No. 16125595

>>16124589
Yes but you only gain back what you spent on accelerating the weights in the first place.

Anonymous No. 16125725

>>16125595
how do you mean that? i thought converting angular in linear velocity is already something special

Anonymous No. 16125863

>>16124606
retard