Image not available

299x265

Tantanmen.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16124678

Imagine a long-term study of the health outcomes from 4 types of Japanese cuisine:
>1. Classic diet: calories 20% from animal products, 70% from white rice / noodles, 10% (fermented) vegetables / condiments, everything mostly boiled or steamed.
>2. Modern diet: same as 1 but everything mostly fried, seared, grilled.
>3. Animal based diet: calories 80% from raw, grilled, seared, boiled, steamed animal products, 20% vegetables, condiments and occasional rice.
>4. Plant-based diet: calories 80% from low-carb plants, 10% animal products, 10%, condiments and occasional rice.
Assume best-quality ingredients for each diet, no smoking, no alcohol, no junk etc. How do health outcomes of these 4 diets compare?

Anonymous No. 16124759

1 would be the best because low oxidised fatty acids, healthier gut microbiome due to fermented items.

Anonymous No. 16125783

>>16124678
All cause mortality study identified salt as the only component to worry about. Everything else is just gas

Anonymous No. 16125846

>>16124678
I don't know, why don't you conduct the study and tell us? If the outcome of every study were predictable then why do we have studies?