Image not available

571x260

2024-04-11-15-11-49.png

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16124919

What are some of the best data falsification techniques?
I want to fake my data so I can publish popular papers to develop a good reputation and get big grants and career advancement that way.
Also how do I know what kind of fake data will produce the most popular publications?

Anonymous No. 16124920

>>16124919
depends on the type of data.
if it's statistics, then it's ezpz

Anonymous No. 16125529

>>16124919
They should teach this in schools, its more important than most of garbage they're shilling

Anonymous No. 16125537

>>16124919
Got source on that, I'm deeply curious but can't find anything on a google search.

Anonymous No. 16125927

Non-repeatable is a classic way to fabricate no evidence. Because the theory that sporadic behaviour does not exist evidently is not proven. So, sporadic occurrences can happen!

Anonymous No. 16126426

>>16124919
Whats most important is that you get the result that the peer reviewers want to see, as long as you do that then any form of data falsification is fair game.
Playing into their confirmation bias will always work.

Anonymous No. 16127683

>>16126426
Keeping the real data to yourself and showing everyone else fake data also makes you smarter while making everyone else dumber. Publishing true information is a cuck move

Anonymous No. 16128444

>>16127683
>Keeping the real data to yourself and showing everyone else fake data also makes you smarter while making everyone else dumber
good point, making other people become dumber is just as good as becoming more intelligent yourself, if you can do both at the same time then you're really winning big