Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:34:50 UTC No. 16125285

what is your problem nigga

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:39:54 UTC No. 16125298

>>16125285
>FART

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 08:59:40 UTC No. 16125331

>>16125285
Two non-intersecting circles do not intersect. Extending the domain of the circle equation to so called "complex numbers" is a purely algebraic trick. It does not mean the circles intersect in some "imaginary" space. Because the object described by a circle equation with "complex" domain is geometrically not a circle anymore.

Barkon at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:02:19 UTC No. 16125333

>>16125331
You're retarded
But this is nothing new.
I often post pointing out the retarded.
It's lonely world of truly good thought in my mind
Pity I'm around the retarded

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:09:28 UTC No. 16125345

>>16125333
Show me a "complex circle", lmao.

Cult of Passion at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:44:32 UTC No. 16125361

>>16125345
>complex circle
You realize thats just a form of dynamic basing, right?

Barkon at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 09:46:46 UTC No. 16125363

>>16125345
Too hard for your retard brain

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:00:46 UTC No. 16125371

Complex numbers are imaginary intersections.
Parabola y=x^2+1 meets line x=0. Obviously they never actually intersect but compex numbers allows impossible to happen. They are truly the reddit of numbers.

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:22:42 UTC No. 16125387

>>16125371
Good example. Taking the parabola y=x^2+1 and the line y=0 and then just declaring x and y to be "complex" constitutes a categorical error. These equations cease to describe parabola and line when the coordinates are suddenly not 1-dimensional but 2-dimensional. Whatever weird surfaces you're intersecting there, you're doing something extremely ungeometric.