🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:08:55 UTC No. 16126353
Science says we need to eat 4700mg of potassium per day. Even if you select a super high potassium food source, like banana, that’s over 11 bananas a day. Nobody in history has ever done that, so how can we have evolved to need it?
Also, everything science has ever said about nutrition turned out to be false.
Science is discredited and retarded. It needs to be dismantled and replaced with literally anything else. Even reading tea leaves would be right SOME of the time.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:12:25 UTC No. 16126357
>>16126353
Does ecological meats and innards contain the nutrients we have evolved with needing?
If so I wouldn't recommend anyone the banana diet.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:21:05 UTC No. 16126368
>>16126357
Science says we should spam bananas all day long. You question Science?
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:22:23 UTC No. 16126371
>>16126353
Potash is basically in every plant.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:28:00 UTC No. 16126388
>>16126353
Could you provide the paper you base these claims on?
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:29:54 UTC No. 16126392
>>16126371
Yeah let’s spend $250 and 4 hours a day trying to cram a small moose’s worth of greens into our stomaches to hit 4700mg. the science way.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:30:54 UTC No. 16126398
>>16126388
Type potassium daily value into search
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:34:20 UTC No. 16126407
>>16126398
So you are outraged that you read some blog and are now mad? I fail to see the issue you are having besides the obvious case of low IQ
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:34:25 UTC No. 16126408
>>16126353
Daily nutrients needs is the canary in the coalmine when it comes to business interests affecting real science
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:36:02 UTC No. 16126413
>>16126407
May I ask if you are acting this dumb to piss us off?
Can we not have one fucken place without your faggotry ? Your dumbcunt arguing is tedious.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:36:51 UTC No. 16126417
>>16126407
>The American Heart Association is a blog because you read their recommendation quoted in a blog
The mind of a scientist
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:38:03 UTC No. 16126419
>>16126413
What about "please provide the source for your claims" is me acting dumb? If you believe the source exists, then simply provide it.
>>16126417
Can you actually provide the link to their paper about the subject then?
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:48:12 UTC No. 16126434
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2V
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:48:47 UTC No. 16126435
>>16126353
Yes you need equimolar amounts of potassium and sodium. Yes you are deficient. The universe itself is deficient. That's what you get for evolving the ion exchange mechanisms.
The real retard here is the schizos who know this yet cope and seethe. Stop eating sugar water. Eat milk and meat and supplement if you're too poor. No excuses.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:49:28 UTC No. 16126438
>>16126419
You are an insincere rat person. There’s a million credible sources
https://www.health.harvard.edu/stay
> That's just 2% of the 4,700 mg recommended dietary intake for potassium.
Now — source on your claims and words? Source? Got source on that? Mmmyeah, gonna need a sourcerino including etymology of words back to at least the Saxon invasion.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:51:03 UTC No. 16126443
>>16126353
I have. I do that. I'm eating a banana right now
Every day i eat more than that
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:51:24 UTC No. 16126445
>>16126438
>You are an insincere rat person. There’s a million credible sources
If there are "a million credible sources" then that means providing one is even easier that means you not providing one looks even worse.
The icing on the cake is that you do in fact link a blog as a response.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:52:39 UTC No. 16126447
I spam bananas
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:54:19 UTC No. 16126449
>>16126438
The FDA requirement for potassium supplements to not contain more than 2.1% of the required daily amount is dangerously close to conspiratorial.
Then again they are saving people from getting thirsty by eating salt pills so maybe they know best.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:03:01 UTC No. 16126456
The icing on the cake is that the source poster above is a pedophile. Pedophiles molest children and that’s bad. Everyone agrees he is a bad pedophile and he’d have to source us good to change this science state.
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 00:47:27 UTC No. 16126542
>>16126353
Why such a hateboner towards "science"? You do realize you dont ever have to listen to anything a scientist says, right?
In fact, nobody has to.
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Apr 2024 01:10:31 UTC No. 16126562
>>16126353
>be me
>know plenty of people 50+
>also few that are 70+
>they all eat shit
>look good, feel well
I don't think science really understand shit when it comes to what we need.