bodhi at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 05:16:10 UTC No. 16136962

>>16136938
>the people who have contributed the most to a field are mentioned the most when discussing that field
wow, didnt see that coming. mind blowing stuff

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Apr 2024 06:10:13 UTC No. 16136987

>>16136962
>the people who have contributed the most to a field are mentioned the most when discussing that field
>this is what /sci/ actually believes

Lol no, those who are marketable are those who get mentioned in the news. Do you really think the news is going to show and interview some introverted Indian or Chinese man who forsaked all social ties to spend 95% of their adult lives in a lab to understand cryptic knowledge? Or some European with decent communication skills that learned about the works and expanded on it?

That's literally the story of modern immunology and computer science. Inoculation and Variolation along with binary system was Indian and Chinese origin. But everyone is more familiar with the European contemporaries and their commentary on the subject matter. No one talks about the IChing but people do talk about Gottfried.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 02:51:39 UTC No. 16138286

>>16136987

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 02:55:33 UTC No. 16138294

>>16136987
>No one talks about the IChing but people do talk about Gottfried
Don't worry, when the Mandate of Heaven comes back to China, everyone in the world will talk about IChing.
CS PhDs are pretty much 50-70% chinks and pajeets nowadays.
Soon it'll only be chink and pajeet names you hear about.

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 03:03:09 UTC No. 16138307

>>16136987
>western media doesnt talk about eastern things, they talk about western thing
Again, wow, didnt see that coming, mind blowing stuff

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:09:58 UTC No. 16138953

>>16136938
Good news racist science bros, looks like science is still racist

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 16:19:40 UTC No. 16139035

>racism is fine if it's against white natives

Are these people awre of the contradiction or is is shameless hypocisy?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 04:49:45 UTC No. 16139901

>>16139035
What you see as shameless hypocrisy is their consistent white genocide agenda. They don't care if you think they're philosophically inconsistent, they want you to be dead rather than satisfied with their philosophically consistency

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:47:12 UTC No. 16141360

>>16139901
pretty much

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:08:06 UTC No. 16142744

>>16136938
Good news racist science bros, looks like science is still racist

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:16:28 UTC No. 16142758

>>16136938
Can we just kill all the smart people already? These dudes really piss me off with their triple digits IQs

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:19:40 UTC No. 16142767

>>16136938
>anglo news mention anglo names

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:43:40 UTC No. 16142818

>>16139035
I have to admit, they've ran with this 2008-era "you can't be racist against white people" stuff much, much farther than I ever thought they would.

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:09:04 UTC No. 16144383

>>16142818
They'll run with it forever. They've been keeping the holohoax lie going for 80 years

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:11:50 UTC No. 16144387

>>16144383
nah holohoax only kicked off in the 60-70s

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:12:57 UTC No. 16144389

what the fuck has this board become