Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:32:34 UTC No. 16139439

If the univarse doesn't expand explain your mothers waistline

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:37:04 UTC No. 16139446

>>16139425
>puts down bong
>exhales
Bruh.

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:44:54 UTC No. 16139456

>>16139425
Mind is blown OP. Let me search Google for more info

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:06:32 UTC No. 16139626

>>16139425
We might be past the event horizon, and falling towards the singularity, for example. The universe would look exactly the same, indistinguishable.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:08:26 UTC No. 16139629

>>16139626
taking a long ass time

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:17:24 UTC No. 16139644

>>16139626
we might be a singularity and space is an illusion. black holes are the default state of the universe

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:20:49 UTC No. 16139652

Same shit.
But we are not shrinking, we are "thinning"

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:46:47 UTC No. 16139975

What makes you believe that an already infinite thing is expanding?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:14:13 UTC No. 16140218

Since universe is infinite in 3 dimensions, then it is according to math of cardinality continuum, so if the cardinality stays the same, maybe universe is only remapping it's "points" (monads in Leibniz terminology) to other points, but movement and all kind of changes in universe are changing placement/remapping of monads, so the expansion of universe in that sense is only specific kind of remapping of monads.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:16:29 UTC No. 16140221

>>16140218
what makes you think that universe is infinite only in 3 dimensions?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:27:58 UTC No. 16140236

>>16140221
I doesn't matter if it is 3 dimensions or hundred, as far as I remember the cardinality would change if we had like infinitely many dimensions as well (although my memory might be flawed). And I haven't heard about any sensical infitely many dimensions physics theory (but that's probably because I am not physicist). If the universe is just moving points, objects that are being morphed in category theory, then the notion of resizing of universe only means remapping points

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:31:50 UTC No. 16140239

>>16139425
But... but redshift.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:49:25 UTC No. 16140261

>>16140239
>the universe is expanding uniformly in all directions
>but the em radiation is magically expanding only towards Earth

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:51:57 UTC No. 16140263

No.jpg

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:40:30 UTC No. 16140304

>>16140236
well, time is a dimension, so there's at least 4

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:05:00 UTC No. 16141634

>muh conspansion
>le actually expansion and contraction are le same thing
Fuck off, Langan. You're a pseud.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 06:05:58 UTC No. 16141692

What if we're actually evaporating and that's where dark energy comes from?

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:11:22 UTC No. 16143105

>>16139425
Gravity overpowers the expansion of they universe at small distances, but over large intergalactic distanced the expansion of the universe wins out.