Image not available

640x480

07A637BD-6322-44B....jpg

🧵 Amateur chemistry

Anonymous No. 16140308

I'm thinking of a project to try extracting pure iron from FeEDTA, but EDTA is pretty annoying, so I first want to try swapping it with a more convenient ligand like chloro/bromo or maybe hydro. No idea how to do it though.

I didn't have a pic to upload along with it, so just for the sake of it I uploaded a random one, ignore it.

Anonymous No. 16140329

>>16140308
If you can't even think of a related picture I have 0 confidence in your ability to follow through on any related project.

Anonymous No. 16140336

>>16140329
Well, I really don't have any related picture except a pic of a bottle of sodium hydroxide, so yeah.

Anonymous No. 16140339

>>16140336
You could literally just use a picture of the chemical formula for the elemental conversion you are seeking, but since you are clearly even too retarded for that, there is no way you are going to understand let along perform a method to do the extraction.

Anonymous No. 16140495

>>16140308
Pyrolyse it at like 900 °C until nothing but oxides are left, then the rest will be much easier.

Anonymous No. 16140635

>>16140339
Damn and I thought reddit was toxic

Anonymous No. 16140640

>>16140495
Seems doable, but how will I protolyse it at that high temperature? Will passing HCl gas on the heated EDTA do the job? Or is there a better method?(I won't be using specialised equipment)

Anonymous No. 16140840

>>16140640
Use a (potentially sacrificial, depends how careful you are) glass test tube and a blowtorch, a crucible would also probably work. You just need to be able to heat the powder indirectly, if you point the blowtorch at it directly it will probably fly away.

If you lack equipment/chemicals I am afraid the reduction to metallic iron will present a substantial challenge though.

Anonymous No. 16140857

>>16140840
That seems doable, I'll most likely use a crucible and a blowtorch. But will just heating the compound turn it into oxides of iron? Or do I also need to do some more steps for that

Anonymous No. 16140861

>>16140840
Also, by saying I won't be using specialised equipment, I was referring to heat resistant quartz glass tubes or furnaces, the chemicals part likely won't be an issue