Image not available

1x1

Kk.pdf

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16141404

>Blacks cant into mathema-

Anonymous No. 16141436

>>16141404
Where did you get this? It sounds like some middle aged white guy's conception of ebonics.

Anonymous No. 16141441

>>16141436
OP probably wrote it himself. the mathematics is simple and probably take like 1-2 hours max to write up.

Anonymous No. 16141460

>>16141436
>>16141441
wrong, black man gave it to me while i was lurking on the street

Anonymous No. 16142628

>>16141441
Imagine spending hours out of your valuable day to type up some gooberish nonsense to impress
>A dead board on 4chan

Anonymous No. 16142647

>>16141460
Kek

Anonymous No. 16142649

>>16141436
>>16141441
Leave it to the old ahh nigga to start acting brand new with that fit.

Guess I cant be too mad at op, his father was never in his life to teach him the method.

Image not available

616x1101

1688741097866757.png

Anonymous No. 16142653

Image not available

605x925

1688409276929554.png

Anonymous No. 16142655

>>16142653

Image not available

617x445

1709010431614502.png

Anonymous No. 16142658

Anonymous No. 16142697

>>16142653
>>16142655
>>16142658
that's just another black soience man. I muted him on twitter long time ago.

Image not available

800x790

KW4.png

Anonymous No. 16142713

>>16141404
>oh muh precious precious blacks
>i am the savior of the lesser races
the inevitable racist attitude of the narcissistic savior complex

Anonymous No. 16142715

>>16142655
This isn't even entirely incorrect. The ability to assign non-standard interpretation to mathematical symbols that respect SOME but not ALL off their usual properties is a pretty interesting, subtle, and profound fact that really does have a lot of relevance when it come to things like information theory, cryptography, model theory, and abstract algebra.

The problem, however, is that he's attempting to use these observations to support these woke political and cultural arguments that just parot your typical neoliberal technocractic globalist talking points and political agenda. If he was genuinely interested in discussing the implications of science, math, and philosophy, for society, and particularly, questions about scientific realism and social constructionism, that would be great, and a really cool subject that hasn't really been explored as much as a it should be (of course, there are exceptions like Heidegger, Nietzsche, some of the sociobiologist/EvoPsych peoplle etc.) However, he's not interested in having those sorts of discussion. It's just like the NPR ceo who was just in the news for basically saying that objective truth is an outdated and oversimplistic concept. The problem is that these people are willing to doubt objective truth when they're talking about "le white people bad" narrative, but when it comes to something like the Lab Leak Hypothesis or the Replication Crisis or criticism of Zionism or any of the other academic third-rail type issue that you're not allowed to talk about, then they forget all about the "social construction of reality" that they always like to talk about. In fact, in these settings, their entire argument is predicated on the notion of "objective truth" and "settled science".

Anonymous No. 16142737

>>16142715
>The ability to assign non-standard interpretation to mathematical symbols that respect SOME but not ALL off their usual properties is a pretty interesting, subtle, and profound fact that really does have a lot of relevance when it come to things like information theory, cryptography, model theory, and abstract algebra.
Yes
>The problem
Racist.

Anonymous No. 16142884

>>16142653
I hate this nigger so much. He genuinely believes people should take him seriously after he's asserted that 2 + 2 = 5.

Anonymous No. 16142891

>>16142653
What does he expect? Trolls will use whatever immutable characteristics you have to insult you. I'd expect a person of color to understand this.