Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:09:55 UTC No. 16143102
Ntma
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:22:04 UTC No. 16143120
>>16141793
Did /sci/ not talk about this at all? I didn't check during the few days after it was published.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:06:51 UTC No. 16143160
>>16143120
a few comments in some other thread
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:15:53 UTC No. 16143261
>>16143120
>>16143160
/sci/ fell off
I was surprised to not see any threads discussing this
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 05:06:11 UTC No. 16143319
Qrd?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:07:26 UTC No. 16144740
>>16143319
a bacteria and an algae merged and became a single organism
Cult of Passion at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:10:46 UTC No. 16144741
Im so deep into Hybridization and Symbiosis it feels like old information to me.
>>16144740
Literal Biblical.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:46:41 UTC No. 16144755
can i hab source plz
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 04:49:34 UTC No. 16144756
>>16144755
>gibes me dat replication crisis publication
how gullible are you?
and why?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:07:44 UTC No. 16145072
>>16144741
nothing biblical about it u jesus freak.
Cult of Passion at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:15:33 UTC No. 16145078
>>16145072
Youre neither a Theologian nor an Evolutionary or Molecular Biologist, why are you lying on the internet?
Let me guess...youve watched a LOT of Discovery Channel, dont insult your intelligence?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:34:19 UTC No. 16145094
Someone is working incorporating algal nitroplasts into food crops, right?
Imagine how productive the world could be with eukaryotic nitrogen fixing.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:35:54 UTC No. 16145095
I know that macroevolution and microevolution are spurious, ill-defined terms coined by young earth creationists, but by their own standards wouldn't this count as an example of macroevolution?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:39:21 UTC No. 16145098
>>16141793
https://web.archive.org/web/2024041
archived version of Nature.com
fuck paywalls
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:40:08 UTC No. 16145099
>>16145078
Abrahamic Theology is fundamentally at odds with biology. pick one.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:41:41 UTC No. 16145102
>>16145099
All theology is fundamentally at odds with biology.
Cult of Passion at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:43:24 UTC No. 16145103
>>16145099
>>16145102
>>16145078
>Youre neither a Theologian nor an Evolutionary or Molecular Biologist, why are you lying on the internet?
>Let me guess...youve watched a LOT of Discovery Channel, dont insult your intelligence?
HOLY FUCKING SHIT.....WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE RETARDED?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:31:44 UTC No. 16145860
>>16145102
I agree but specifically Abrahamic myths are both more outrageous and more popular than most others.
At least Buddhists tend to just masturbate over abstract shit like nothingness and whatnot, they don't even care about the physical world and thus keep their retarded filth away from science. Abrahamists specifically are far more intrusive in scientific discussions and actively harm science more than most other religions ever dream of.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:40:16 UTC No. 16146053
>>16145860
It's a real shame we now have this level of fedora midwittery on /sci/
Perhaps reddit is more you speed
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:02:32 UTC No. 16146156
>>16146053
>calls others midwits
>"this jew is god btw"
ok.
Cult of Passion at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:24:38 UTC No. 16146188
>>16145860
>and actively harm science
YOU ARE NOT A DOCTOR OF ANY KIND.
WHY ARE YOU, THE *PEOPLE OF THE LIE*, CONSTANTLY LYING IN SCIENTIFIC PAPERS?
ONLY BELIEVERS DO GOOD SCIENCE NOW...YOUR ERA OF WANTON SATANISM IS OVER.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:52:17 UTC No. 16146216
>>16141793
>>16143120
This is a very slow board and this is the first time I've seen /sci/ talk about it since it's reveal on April 16th. It also doesn't help that /sci/ has earnestly never been particularly interested in biology, agriscience, or medicine; /sci/ has always been more of a maths & engineering board. With Election Tourists turning it into a clot-shot discussion board and climate-change denial club.
>>16143319
>Qrd?
A species of phytoplankton algae (native to the pacific ocean) has managed to successfully envelope, and assimilate, a species of nitrogen fixing bacteria into its' body as a new organelle. The bacteria is no longer symbiotic, but an actual permeant addition of the phytoplankton's physiology and gets replicated when it replicates and passed on when it has whatever it considers sex.
This is significant for two reasons:
-Nitrogen fixing has previously been the sole domain of bacteria.
-This is observable documented evidence of -I can't remember the word for it- that theory where progressively complex organisms evolved by forming permanent long-term relationships with other bacteria to form their organelles and to in effect become "creatures in a trench coat".
>>16144755
>can i hab source plz
Try these:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126
https://astrobiology.com/2024/04/th
Cult of Passion at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 02:02:26 UTC No. 16146228
>>16146216
>/sci/ has always been more of a maths & engineering board
Yurp, I dont really do much research on Biology here, though there is a clear subculture for Molecular Biology but that aint my forté, just not that into BioChemistry.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:42:35 UTC No. 16146629
>>16144740
>an algae
what the fuck is with you guys and the inability to correctly use singular vs. plural?
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:43:48 UTC No. 16146631
>>16146629
and again
>The bacteria is
here >>16146216
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:19:52 UTC No. 16146649
>>16144740
basically humans have this bacteria too, called mitochondria. we are containing a parasite in our every cell
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:09:11 UTC No. 16146695
>>16146649
Arguably we are just as much our mitochondria as we are any other part of our bodies. Perhaps more, as mitochondria play a key role in regulating electrical potential across cell membranes, which is at some level fundamental to awareness.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:49:28 UTC No. 16146831
>>16141793
Excuse me? And how does this supposedly 'blow me the fuck out?'