Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:14:33 UTC No. 16142174
>>16142173
>Objective and guided by data
sounds like art to me
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:19:09 UTC No. 16142180
>>16142173
Is cat a dog?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:20:12 UTC No. 16142181
>>16142173
100% art nowadays.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:26:31 UTC No. 16142193
>>16142180
They used to be
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 16:20:00 UTC No. 16142254
>>16142173
define art
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:55:20 UTC No. 16142836
>>16142173
art is science
bodhi at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:56:04 UTC No. 16142838
>>16142173
is art a science?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:58:50 UTC No. 16142843
>>16142173
Science leaves very little room for creativity.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 05:42:34 UTC No. 16143354
>>16142843
The first step of the method is literally to create a hypothesis, the next stop to create an experiment, then created data, then analyze the data you created from the experiment your created to test the hypothesis you created.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:08:55 UTC No. 16143385
In the strictest sense, no, but it can be artistically presented or used to produce art. Also, how humans produce and process art can be studied as a science although individual works of art would not be the science there. Likewise art can be used in science, but in that context, its artistic character is simply an unavoidable byproduct of human expression and not a desirous or fundamental component.
Science is built on systematic reproducibility which is fundamentally antithetical to art.
About the closest you get to science being an art is cooking wherein depending on the motive of the person preparing the food it can either be an artistic science or a scientific art.
On a completely unrelated note, Dadaism isn't art either.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:09:57 UTC No. 16143386
>>16143354
Science is discovered, not created.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 06:15:49 UTC No. 16143394
>>16143386
Discovery is just the creation of a novel observation.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:58:04 UTC No. 16143902
>>16142838
In a way, yes.
People will say is no objectivity in art, but those people are retarded
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:32:32 UTC No. 16143930
>Is science an art?
umm yes
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:02:11 UTC No. 16143964
It can be. But a lot of science is rote repetition and that part is unavoidable in experimentation. Designing experiments can be a sort of art, though.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 19:05:21 UTC No. 16144076
>>16142181
third panel, top of camera
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:31:54 UTC No. 16144186
>>16142173
>is (thing) a (different thing)
no.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:48:04 UTC No. 16144218
Are frogposters homosexual?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:23:46 UTC No. 16144293
>>16144076
sus