Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:53:17 UTC No. 16146764

>>16146347
> battery equivalent energy density???
no it isn't. not even close. eat shit

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:25:09 UTC No. 16146800

>>16146347
Sounds totally possible, just make sure you take care of ground

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:21:51 UTC No. 16147108

>capacitor: holds less energy than battery for less time
>inductor: holds less energy than capacitor for less time
>slopping one energy between the two's rating gives better energy density
Yeah

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:50:05 UTC No. 16147158

>>16147108
>resonance? what’s that?

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:47:51 UTC No. 16147241

>>16147158
Your buzzword "resonance" doesn't have any meaning in this context dumbass. You can pull as much energy as you fed into this circuit initially. And storing Li-Ion battery level energy into a capacitor would require megavolts of voltage. Good luck finding a capacitor that doesn't explode at those voltage levels.
Secondly you picked an LC circuit because of this mighty "resonance" but in fact the energy stored in this circuit will quickly vanish due to ohmic losses in both of these components.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:37:53 UTC No. 16147499

>>16146347
Because people already invested a lot in their manufacture. And also is good to have lithium sitting around when we switch batteries, so lithium can be used in space craft.