Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 14:26:48 UTC No. 16148506

>>16148500
It proves nothing of that sort

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:44:06 UTC No. 16148955

>>16148500
It proves light has wave properties and all laws that work on regular waves work on light waves
Then that hypothesis ends up being wrong when they try to derive the Radiance function of a black body, and its discovered that light's energy is quantized (in discrete chunks)
So I don't really get what you mean by
>reality can change its laws based off that observation

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:48:36 UTC No. 16148957

>>16148955
If you observe the particles they go through only one slit but if you don't observe them they go through both

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:50:58 UTC No. 16148961

>>16148957
>If you observe
as in interact with? and you're wondering why they change their behavior?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:51:55 UTC No. 16148962

>>16148961
Its just if you record them. There's nothing inherent about recording them that should change their behavior and no one has proven how it changes their behavior. I dont think you understand the experiment.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:57:39 UTC No. 16148967

>>16148962
>Its just if you record them
how would you manage to do that?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:58:56 UTC No. 16148971

>>16148962
here's recorded interference pattern. why didn't it change its behavior?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 20:59:51 UTC No. 16148973

>>16148967
photodetectors

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:02:11 UTC No. 16148977

>>16148973
what do you suppose a camera is anon?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:03:58 UTC No. 16148979

>>16148967
The variation of the experiment op is talking about is the one where individual photons are detected passing thorough the slits. That image is just the interference pattern of a laser beam. Also you're retarded

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:05:13 UTC No. 16148980

>>16148979
how do you detect individual photons by not interacting with them totally-not-retarded anon?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:05:18 UTC No. 16148981

>>16148977
Then why tf did you ask me how they recorded the photons you faggot

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:06:20 UTC No. 16148985

>>16148980
Look guys this person is a genius and solved the double slit experiment. It was the damn cameras the whole time. Someone give this guy a nobel prize.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:12:10 UTC No. 16148990

>>16148985
just pointing out that you interacting with them changes their behavior. wow such crazy idea amirite

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:13:56 UTC No. 16148993

>>16148990
Yeah but that's not what changes their behavior

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:15:30 UTC No. 16148994

>>16148971
No missing dots?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:44:08 UTC No. 16149019

>>16148500
Proves the wave-particle duality of photons and matter, such as e.g. electrons and even molecules.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:07:29 UTC No. 16149045

>>16149019
Molecules too?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:48:32 UTC No. 16149115

>>16148979
if this is what you mean, then no, it still shows an interference pattern or is completely random at small time intervals as show in this video
if this isnt what you mean, please list a demonstration of the experiment and how they go through only one slit
https://youtu.be/GzbKb59my3U