🗑️ 🧵 Evolution is lie
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:40:52 UTC No. 16149016
Evolution can't be proved using experiment.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:41:54 UTC No. 16149017
Selective breeding is evolution. Next question.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:44:32 UTC No. 16149020
>>16149017
What about rape ?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:49:06 UTC No. 16149023
>>16149016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._co
I think it can.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:49:53 UTC No. 16149025
>>16149017
Selective breeding doesn't turn one animal into another one.
>but muh millions of years
Not even then. Darwinism promises missing links that we simply don't find anywhere.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:50:29 UTC No. 16149026
>>16149023
How about life itself ? is life started randomly ? I think it's impossible
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:51:36 UTC No. 16149029
>>16149023
Okay, let us know when they evolve into something other than E. coli.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:56:50 UTC No. 16149033
>>16149029
https://newatlas.com/biology/life-m
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 21:58:24 UTC No. 16149034
>>16149033
That doesn't mean nothing
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:02:10 UTC No. 16149039
>>16149034
of-course anon. it's as simple as denying reality.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:08:31 UTC No. 16149046
>>16149025
Yes it does, holy fuck you're dumb
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:11:45 UTC No. 16149049
>>16149033
>Altogether, the team says this indicates UCYN-A is a full organelle, which is given the name of nitroplast. It appears that this began to evolve around 100 million years ago
So basically they were studying B. bigelowii and decided that one of its organelles seemed somehow similar to this UCYN-A bacteria and then made up a story that one turned into the other 100 million years ago with no physical evidence other than the (separate) existence of two similar-seeming things. What does this prove, again?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:13:37 UTC No. 16149052
>>16149049
>What does this prove, again?
clearly something you don't like
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:25:38 UTC No. 16149073
>>16149052
There's no actual evidence for what they're claiming. They're not saying they observed this taking place, they're just asserting this happened 100 million years ago.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:27:49 UTC No. 16149075
>>16149073
> I don't like an answer back by evidence from multiple sources so I will just call tens of thousands of biologists and a century of science wrong instead.
you're a genius.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:33:29 UTC No. 16149081
>>16149073
I don't actually want to convince you.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:33:39 UTC No. 16149083
>>16149073
Farmers and other animal keepers practice evolution daily
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:33:40 UTC No. 16149084
>>16149075
Backed by WHAT evidence? I read that whole article and it's nothing but assertions about what happened tens of millions of years ago. They're not claiming this happened over time in a lab, they're just making up links between things and then dating it all an unfalsifiably long time ago.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:35:08 UTC No. 16149088
>>16149084
let's be real you'd deny anything anyway
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:36:18 UTC No. 16149092
>>16149083
Okay, let us know when farmers make cows evolve into an animal other than cows.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:36:44 UTC No. 16149093
>>16149088
He is right , biologists can say anything and the horde will kindly believe
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:38:50 UTC No. 16149095
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:38:53 UTC No. 16149096
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:46:05 UTC No. 16149109
>>16149084
https://www.nature.com/articles/nat
There are tens, possibly hundreds, of experiments like this all showing macro evolution at work and that doesn't even include all the genetic evolution observations. But as the other anon said, it doesn't matter how many examples we give you will never change your mind. You are a perfect example of devolution.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:46:13 UTC No. 16149110
>>16149088
>Evolution can't be proved using experiment.
>Scientists have been observing changes in E. coli over tens of thousands of generations.
>Have they evolved into anything other than E. coli?
>Here's an article about an unrelated bacteria.
>That evolution didn't result from experiment and there's no physical evidence provided at all.
>So I guess you're just smarter than every scientist in history, huh?
>No, there just is factually no evidence nor did this happen from an experiment.
>Even if there was evidence you'd deny it!
Your argumentation method is disingenuous and retarded. First you moved the goalposts to some other equally unproven thing, now you're just flinging insults because I pointed that out.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:48:15 UTC No. 16149114
>>16149110
nah I'm pretty sure you'll deny anything anyway. as I said, I don't want to convince you.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:50:56 UTC No. 16149117
>>16149109
So they successfully bred a strain of fruit flies that can survive in the dark. That's cool, but I never denied that organisms can adapt and change over time. So at what point did they stop being fruit flies and start being a different animal? If they didn't, then your point remains unproven.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:52:44 UTC No. 16149119
>>16149117
>That's cool, but I never denied that organisms can adapt and change over time.
holy shit the Tucker argument
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:53:45 UTC No. 16149121
>>16149117
>flies
>different animal
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:54:39 UTC No. 16149122
>>16149117
> Evolution can't be proved using experiment.
> I never denied that organisms can adapt and change over time
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:56:04 UTC No. 16149123
>>16149117
You're funny and why warning labels were invented.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 22:59:39 UTC No. 16149124
>>16149119
I see no reason to extrapolate from animals adapting to their environment to animals becoming completely different animals.
>>16149122
Blame disingenuous Darwinists for using the same term for different things so they can shift goalposts at will. Animals changing into different animals (what the theory of evolution proposes) can't be proven using experiment.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:01:27 UTC No. 16149126
>>16149124
>can't be proven using experiment.
how do you always end up with this defense? don't you find it weird? coinquidink
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:03:04 UTC No. 16149129
>>16149126
Show me an experiment where one animal becomes another animal.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:05:41 UTC No. 16149132
>>16149121
>insects aren't animals
Retard.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:10:34 UTC No. 16149138
There is nothing in genetics or proteomics which stops accumulated small mutations from leading to large scale phenotypic changes over time. Everything in genetics, biology, the fossil record, anthropology, zoology, literally everything proves evolution is true.
If you want to falsify the theory of evolution you have to show why accumulated mutations in the genome can't lead to accumulated changes in phenotype. Just saying "it can't happen you can't get a whole new animal over time from the ancient ancestor" isn't an argument.
Personally though I don't actually think that you don't understand this. I don't believe that creationists are actually so stupid that they think adding up small things doesn't lead to big things over time. I think you're just scared of death and you think evolution being true means your belief in an afterlife is false.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:12:31 UTC No. 16149140
>>16149129
don't want to because you're not legitimate in your arguments. it's seriously asymmetric in the wrong way for some reason. I don't have to convince you about shit, you should convince me of your retarded position. proof of God anon.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:19:24 UTC No. 16149154
>>16149140
Evolution can be true or false independently of the existence or nonexistence of God.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Apr 2024 23:21:02 UTC No. 16149156
>>16149154
God and Darwinistic evolution can both be true. tho clearly a different God than the one you'd hope for.