Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:28:04 UTC No. 16149270

>i hate /sci/
good, go away
goodbye

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:32:04 UTC No. 16149278

ye kinda over it as well. anything without reddit tier bullshit or retarded moderation. there seem to be constant retards here specifically ruining science convos. seems like some weird thing for this place.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:35:58 UTC No. 16149281

There are minority forums out there for specific topics.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:42:32 UTC No. 16149288

>>16149270
Do you know better places where I should go to post about science?

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:44:18 UTC No. 16149291

>>16149281

Yeah how do I find these? As far as using the internet i'm braindead

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:45:08 UTC No. 16149293

>who post actually know what's going on beyond undergrad?
most of these people are doing research to submit to journals not discussion boards

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:49:01 UTC No. 16149296

>>16149293

Sure, but not not on the weekends lol

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 00:52:22 UTC No. 16149301

>>16149296
its just a supply/demand problem in the end
most people want undergraduate level content and thats the level you tend to get on the internet
although I have started to see more advanced topics covered as time goes by they are still pretty niche

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:47:38 UTC No. 16150267

>>16149296
they are probably doing something else.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 18:54:49 UTC No. 16150280

Imagine if Newton had had access to 4chan

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:09:16 UTC No. 16150306

>>16150280
still would have died a virgin

Cult of Passion at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:22:07 UTC No. 16150330

>>16149264
This is supposed to be a place for researcher's "after hours talk".

A glass of with a little brown, smoke, evil schemes, kot.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:05:11 UTC No. 16150415

>>16149264
No the Internet is too compromised for that. We aren't living in 2005 anymore.

You either have normies or schizos, often both.

Only good forums I've found have been locked in side corporate or organizational chats.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:40:11 UTC No. 16150462

>>16150415
it's kind of cucked. get banned for anything out of corporate accepted speech and need email accounts and shit.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:41:12 UTC No. 16150466

>>16150415
So we're back to the preinternet discussion days?
All of this technological progress has actually taken us backwards.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:44:59 UTC No. 16150471

>>16150466
>All of this technological progress has actually taken us backwards.
it actually pulled the normies in and they brought in all their bullshit.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:47:53 UTC No. 16150475

>>16150471
The two types destroying /sci/ are normies who want to shut down discussion they find offensive and low IQ schizos who just derail discussion into nonsense. Both groups are quite numerous which impacts the quality of discussion quite a bit.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:49:28 UTC No. 16150477

>>16150471
people used to live in the real world and use the internet as a form of escape, now the only form of escape is to return to the real world.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:59:55 UTC No. 16150492

>>16150477
well, partially. sure people spent more time outside but they were pretty hooked on cable TV as well.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:03:37 UTC No. 16150496

>>16149264
physics stackexchange is what i recommend. its not a forum, but good place to get quality answers if you ask quality questions

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:08:51 UTC No. 16150503

>>16150496
never posted anything there. but did read some good answers, in time.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 23:34:56 UTC No. 16150773

>>16150466
Yes. Why are you surprised? In effort to make everything easier and more accessible the effect is created. The Internet is easy and accessible to use. Specialized forums are a bit dead because of this ESPECIALLY specialized forums on things that attract schizos and normies like physics.

This is also all the fault of Physicists as well. Like 100% on them. They purposefully glamorize and make the field seem exotic, masters of hiring STEM writers to come up with interesting metaphors for the actually dry and straightforward math and experiments being done.

Ask yourself this, when has an experiment ACTUALLY been discussed in any article going out to the public? Not the results either, but the design, the data points, how they explored the space of design to arrive at a conclusion or the data to conclude something? These dry topics are ignored because physicists just want to memorize the normies, attract the schizos, and secure public funding. But this has the added effect of ruining 'public' discourse of the field.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 23:49:07 UTC No. 16150801

>>16150773
>this is also all the fault of physicists as well
Another fucking idiot. Physicists don’t write your popsci articles you fucking moron. It’s the fault of science journalists not the people who do the real work. You write three paragraphs of self righteous bitching just to prove that you’re one of the idiots who ruins discussions on this board because he’s too stupid to know anything but still wants to force his opinion on everyone else anyway.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:36:04 UTC No. 16150899

are there other /sci/ like image boards? I like the no account anon thing

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:55:14 UTC No. 16150944

>>16150801
Literally all of your directors green light and encourage it. Every major national lab has entire communications divisions focused solely on that interface. Universities are the same way, maybe not embedded into the physics departments, but you better believe they work and greenlight university press which is where this ALL starts.

You clearly don't know the actual politics of your field.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 01:25:48 UTC No. 16150987

>>16150899
is mathchan still alive?

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Apr 2024 01:58:10 UTC No. 16151028

>>16150801
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah1QMVfYL2I
One example argument of astronomers leading the public astray, booooosting creationism, and then trying to take it back - I know, astronomy isn't science, but this fits an example pattern to be on the look at for. They posit some absurd non-sense and someone points out the ramifications and then they piss themselves.
It is only a matter of time before the black hole picture to be outed as fake and gay. Come to think of it, does any scientific field have this or is it just those star gazing fags? Maybe the hotters also?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Apr 2024 01:21:11 UTC No. 16152531

>>16150987
seems ded