Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 00:46:34 UTC No. 16155605

>>16155583
>You have numbers 1 to 9
>0?

Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 00:53:40 UTC No. 16155612

>>16155583
Yes. It's God. Not different number bases. That shit is made-up.

Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 05:36:53 UTC No. 16155944

>>16155583
>everything works
No, you will never calculate a diagonal length, sqrt(2) will never resolve.

Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 05:41:23 UTC No. 16155951

true

Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 06:54:36 UTC No. 16156074

>>16155583
Gets even crazier when you consider numerology, but unironically.

Take the number 13 for example.
In numerology you add the two integers together. so 13 would be 1+3=4 or 13=4
But get this, if you add 9 to any number, it essentially acts as a 0. 13+9=22 2+2=4
This works for any multiple of 9.
666 is 74 times 9.
So 13+666=679 6+7+9=22 2+2=4
or try a different sequence.
7+18=25 2+5=7

Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 10:22:08 UTC No. 16156252

>>16155583
>You have numbers 1 to 9
Did you mean digits? 11 is also a number.
>but why isn't it going further with different symbols?
IF you use base 16 (hexadecimal) you also get to use letters A - F as digits.