๐งต Pi (ฯ)
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 15:54:39 UTC No. 16156541
3.141592653589793238462643383279502
Can you find the pattern in this sequence of numbers or are you below 140 IQ?
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 16:21:21 UTC No. 16156582
>>16156541
My intuition tells me that the first 144 digits add up to 666.
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 16:26:33 UTC No. 16156594
>>16156541
The pattern is trivial to find with the right base, so ฯ ends looking like this:
2.222...
2+(1/3)(2+(2/5)(2+(3/7)(2+...)))
meanwhile in base 10 is:
3+(1/10)(1+(1/10)(4+(1/10)(1+...)))
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 17:02:19 UTC No. 16156654
>>16156594
Interesting take. One issue I see is that if you started with the value of pi expressed in some other system and tried to convert it to that base, following the most obvious algorithm, you would most likely obtain
3+(1/3)(0+(2/5)(1+(3/7)(0+(4/9)(0+(
instead of the desired repeating sequence. But perhaps there's a nice rule we could impose (one that would work for all numbers, so we can't just say "always choose 2") which would give us the desired sequence.
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 18:39:11 UTC No. 16156766
>>16156582
Your intuition is stupid, the average value of a random number from 0-9 is 5 and 666 < 144 * 5. So there is a low chance of that.
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 18:48:58 UTC No. 16156784
>>16156541
The obvious pattern that stands out to me is that if you multiply this number by the diameter of a circle, you get an excellent approximation of its circumference.
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 19:45:15 UTC No. 16156831
why do you need so many pi digits anyway
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 19:55:24 UTC No. 16156846
>>16156766
Interesting, did you add them up?
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 20:25:29 UTC No. 16156876
This actually is just tism...
Anonymous at Thu, 2 May 2024 22:58:21 UTC No. 16157037
>>16156541
What's the pattern? If you don't answer you've less IQ than an african.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 11:41:45 UTC No. 16157601
>>16156654
>But perhaps there's a nice rule we could impose (one that would work for all numbers, so we can't just say "always choose 2") which would give us the desired sequence.
I noticed that pi/2 does work out to the expected repeating pattern using the obvious algorithm. One rule you could impose to make pi work out is "always choose even digits."
Cult of Passion at Fri, 3 May 2024 12:12:50 UTC No. 16157622
>>16156541
>3.141592653589
I needed like this many digit to crack Pi.
Thats why its called "easy as Pi".
>You cannot hide from Me....youre Me...
Cult of Passion at Fri, 3 May 2024 12:15:05 UTC No. 16157623
>>16157622
>Me
Cute and valid, in case anyone here is an evil piece of shit.
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 14:15:54 UTC No. 16157714
>>16157623
I want to pet the cat
Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 14:28:35 UTC No. 16157721
>>16156541
oh I know this pattern. That's a good rational approximation of picrel
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 03:50:11 UTC No. 16158499
>>16156582
>>16156846
658.
Pretty nifty.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 04:50:26 UTC No. 16158542
>>16156541
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35e
bodhi at Sat, 4 May 2024 09:35:02 UTC No. 16158748
OMG I-IS I-IS THAT A CIRCUMFERENCE? AHHHHH IM GOING INSANE!