Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:05:16 UTC No. 16157915

>>16157820
>kW/h
You are a retard.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:05:53 UTC No. 16157917

> kW/h
OK retard

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:08:16 UTC No. 16157919

there is still time to delete the tread out of embarrassment

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:08:39 UTC No. 16157920

>>16157820
This worldbuilding is shit.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:13:52 UTC No. 16157928

>>16157820
how are we going to explain to aliens that we burned all our radioactive shit reserves to power up tiktok watching devices

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:28:50 UTC No. 16157956

Any of you niggers going to explain why kW/h is a bad metric? Because it doesn't account for efficiency losses in using it as a fuel?
>>16157920
What's the problem with this answer then

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:40:06 UTC No. 16157985

Homo/retard

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:41:01 UTC No. 16157987

>>16157915
>>16157917
it's not a big deal

Barkon at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:41:27 UTC No. 16157989

>>16157985
Kys now

WRJ4SP

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:49:42 UTC No. 16158002

>>16157820
why electric canrs burn 20 kWh per 100km? the same diesel car would burn 7 liters at least

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:50:47 UTC No. 16158005

>>16157820
There are already far better technologies to provide cheap energy for all mankind. Renewables like wind are a complete scam, there is no such a thing as global warming.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 17:57:37 UTC No. 16158017

>>16157956
>kW/h is a bad metric
Hope that's bait.
1kW/h = 10 kw in 10 hours.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 18:38:12 UTC No. 16158051

>>16158017
Wow, what a zinger. OP misspelled the unit and suddenly he's a retard. You're so smart anon

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 18:44:05 UTC No. 16158057

>>16157956
>>16157987
>>16158051
It demonstrates ignorance and a lack of basic understanding. Go back to high school physics if this upsets you.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:26:43 UTC No. 16158099

so I could have RTG car?

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:40:14 UTC No. 16158115

>>16157920
Just make the main race of your world frightened of the gweem scawy glowing stuff, absolutely pants pooing SCARED.EXE, then the absurd pic you showed is instantly balanced out.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 19:43:50 UTC No. 16158122

>>16158051
None with the slightest grasp of science " "misspells" (in RL uses a total different unit). But on this forsaken glownigger/bot board it's usual deliberate.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:11:36 UTC No. 16158263

Retardo OP and posters.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:37:59 UTC No. 16158289

>>16158057
He could understand what a kilowatt hour is and still add that by mistake. I believe he deserves the benefit of the doubt

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 22:57:06 UTC No. 16158315

>>16158017
>energy per time per time
lol idiot

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 23:01:14 UTC No. 16158320

>>16158017
you must be retarded. 1kWh is the total energy quantity. 1kW is power at any time you measure.
1kW appliance ran for one hour uses up 1kWh of energy.
thus, 1kWh can be spread out like 100W power draw for 10 hours. 10W for 100 hours, or 10kW for 6 minutes.

Anonymous at Fri, 3 May 2024 23:09:59 UTC No. 16158329

>>16157820
Our 4th fission reactor just achieved fission in march here in Georgia. Each reactor supplies about a million homes, I believe.

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:41:54 UTC No. 16158392

>>16158320
>retarded
Kwh vs. Kw/h
This board is auf den Hund gekommen.

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 00:42:59 UTC No. 16158393

>>16158392
>Kw
kYs

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 01:18:41 UTC No. 16158420

>>16158289
>He typed it out six times by mistake!

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 08:28:08 UTC No. 16158701

>>16157820
wrong, factorio taught me the correct values are 2MJ for wood, 4MJ for coal, 12MJ for solid petroleum fuel, 80GJ for U-235

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 08:41:26 UTC No. 16158709

>>16157820
Always seemed retarded that we actually use "watt-hours" as a unit rather than megajoules or whatever

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 08:58:38 UTC No. 16158720

[math] \displaystyle

\left \{
\begin{array}{l}
P~power \\
U~voltage \\
I~current \\
W~work,energy \\
t~time \\
F~force \\
s~distance \\
m~mass \\
a~acceleration \\
v~speed \\
\\
P=UI\\
P= \dfrac{W}{t}= \dfrac{F \cdot s}{t}= \dfrac{ma \cdot s}{t}
= \dfrac{m \dfrac{v}{t} \cdot s}{t}= \dfrac{m \dfrac{s/t}{t} \cdot s}{t}
= \dfrac{m \cdot s^2}{t^3}
\end{array}
\right.
\\\\
\left \{
\begin{array}{l}
W~watt \\
V~volt \\
A~ampere \\
J~joule \\
s~second \\
N~newton \\
m~meter \\
kg~kilogram \\
\\
W=V \cdot A \\
W= \dfrac{J}{s}= \dfrac{N\cdot m}{s}= \dfrac{kg \cdot \frac{m}{s^2} \cdot m}{s}
= \dfrac{kg \cdot m^2}{s^3}
\end{array}
\right.

[/math]

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 09:20:05 UTC No. 16158738

>>16157956
>explain why kW/h is a bad metric
Nigger google it:
>the energy delivered by one kilowatt of power for one hour
Also typically used to indicate electricity consumption of household appliances. Instead: how much joule does a mass / female mooncycle element deliver and what does it cost to get that energy released, stored and distributed?

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 09:43:56 UTC No. 16158756

>>16158738
>>16158315

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 10:11:31 UTC No. 16158766

>>16158756
Per time per time does make sense though. It's not redundant to say how long a rate of effort is sustained.

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 10:57:41 UTC No. 16158803

>>16158766
I'm sure you use it all the time

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 11:02:08 UTC No. 16158804

>went to nuclear debate night
>think we were about 100 people
>only three of us were under 50 years old
>speaker says nuclear waste and i cringe
>don't call it that you idiot, say spent fuel
>too late, the boomers are all fired up now
it was entertaining but the old people was clearly only there to be angry and demand more wind turbines

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 11:46:53 UTC No. 16158841

>>16158803
Everyone does because we have energy bills to pay so we consider for example wether or not we really need an extra amount of rpm in our washing machine and if we decide to use such houserhold appliances more frequently we may choose lower outputs to save costs/energy.

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 11:54:41 UTC No. 16158851

>>16158804
But it is nuclear waste you sneaky jew

Anonymous at Sat, 4 May 2024 16:05:33 UTC No. 16159226

>>16158841
Your energy bills are not billed in kW/h