🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 15:46:39 UTC No. 16160800
alright /sci/, explain to me why the theories of both cyclical universes and the universe coming from a black hole are at least coined but nobody is talking about current day or future black holes actually being the cause of our own big bang in the past if looking at the wormholes / penrose diagrams.
If a black hole isn't so much a region in space but more a point in time (end of time), and a wormhole being able to throw you (or better said your particles) out both ways theoreticly when it cuts off, why wouldn't there be a chance to end up our the start of our own universe? Even if infinitesimally small.
It struck me as odd that i found 0 results on google on this.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 18:12:32 UTC No. 16160965
>>16160800
just watch the latest veritasium episode
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 18:29:38 UTC No. 16160995
>>16160800
We did this three days ago. You're ahead of schedule.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 20:44:35 UTC No. 16161271
>>16160800
Just sit inside your light cone and stfu
>Google
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 22:53:51 UTC No. 16161455
>>16160965
he did thats why he made the thread
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 23:11:10 UTC No. 16161476
>>16160800
That's basically what a wormhole is, isn't it? Not just space travel, but time. I believe the caveat for using them (pinching off) was in the video
Anonymous at Sun, 5 May 2024 23:15:57 UTC No. 16161483
what is it about black holes that makes them the number one most popular popsci topic of discussion amongst the brainlet soience fangoys?
is it the comic bookish aspects of the spectacular, unrealistic and completely non disprovable conjectures which go along with the topic that make black holes so popular amongst the scientist posers and wannabes?