Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 08:48:14 UTC No. 16161906

>>16161901
>>males arent needed after mating and having a bunch of males hanging around doing nothing uses up resources that the offspring need
Males aren't needed after mating, until a bigger, meaner male comes along and kills the offspring so that the female can focus her time and resources onto HIS offspring instead. At that point, perhaps the female would wish that the first male had stuck around to protect her and the child.
>only a very small number of males are needed to fertilise a large number of females
See above. All of those vulnerable women and children need to be protected and provided for.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 09:25:30 UTC No. 16161939

>>16161906
>until a bigger, meaner male comes along
>At that point, perhaps the female would wish that the first male had stuck
/sci/ is the lowest IQ board.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:05:07 UTC No. 16161994

>>16161901
>males arent needed after mating
Then why does the male population not look like fast maturing short-lived hypercompetitive more-brawn-than-brain brawlers? In b4:
>muh social constructs
because that's a few thousand years against a hundred thousand years.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:06:05 UTC No. 16161995

>>16161906
Women will happily let their children die when a "bigger meaner male comes along". Obviously bigger and meaner means more alpha and hence better genetics. Why raise the offspring of a weak beta?

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:07:50 UTC No. 16161998

>>16161994
>Then why does the male population not look like fast maturing short-lived hypercompetitive more-brawn-than-brain brawlers?
Most men do look like this. Only in recent years soiciety allowed soibois to exist because they can be used as wagie slaves.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:17:09 UTC No. 16162005

>>16161995
>Women will happily let their children die when a "bigger meaner male comes along".
Then whence cometh civilization?

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:17:36 UTC No. 16162006

>>16161995
Flawless logic, no need to check this against reality

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:19:21 UTC No. 16162008

>>16162005
Civilization is a beta male invention. Women may be profiting from it but they don't contribute to it. Their mating preferences are stuck in stone age, i.e. a male has to be tall and dominant, not smart.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:19:46 UTC No. 16162010

>>16161995
Yes, this is why monogamous pair-bonding isn't seen in virtually every human society that ever existed. Instead, a small minority of men have harems of women producing children for them.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:14 UTC No. 16162012

>>16162006
Do we really need to post a huge collection of twitter screenshots of news articles about women being indicted for letting their ex partner's child die from neglect or allowing their new violent partner to beat the child dead? It does happen way too often.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:58 UTC No. 16162014

>>16162008
You're holding up the example of sociopathic narcissistic women as if all women behaved that way. You sound like the feminists who say that all men are rapists and that all PIV sex is oppressive rape.
Most women don't want to be part of a harem. They might have unrealistic standards, but how is that any different from mid-tier men who want a 18yo supermodel virgin tradwife?

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:24:37 UTC No. 16162017

>>16162012
For every example of what you described, there are 100 more of women who have suffered and sacrificed for their child's wellbeing, or left an abusive relationship for the sake of the child's welfare.
The existence of wolves doesn't mean dogs cease to exist.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:28:09 UTC No. 16162023

>>16162014
I have yet to see evidence of a woman who isn't a psychopath and who doesn't lust for a tall handsome guy regardless of how many other women he has.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:32:02 UTC No. 16162027

>>16162017
No mother truly loves her child. They only see a child as an object to raise their own social status. When it's a beta male's offspring it doesn't fulfill this purpose and consequently gets treated with the same disregard the beta male father receives.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:34:39 UTC No. 16162030

>>16162012
>Do we really need to post a huge collection of twitter screenshots
No need, I can just start laughing at you now

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:35:58 UTC No. 16162034

>>16162023
I have yet to see evidence of a sociopathic misogynist who hasn't simply reaped what he has sown. Your negative perception of women is a reflection of your own poisoned personality. You are the psychopath, evidenced by your demonstrably wrong beliefs.
>>16162027
It's a good thing you will never reproduce.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:41:16 UTC No. 16162040

>>16162034
>your own poisoned personality
But who poisoned it? I was an innocent boy. My mother was a psychopath and all women I ever met treated me with utmost contempt. How did I deserve such a treatment? Apparently my crime consisted in "not being a tall and dominant man".

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:44:10 UTC No. 16162049

>>16162040
>mommy was mean to me so all women are irredeemable worthless whores
Now do the same thing but with an abusive father. Do you see how stupid such broad generalisations of half the species are?

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:48:00 UTC No. 16162055

>>16162049
Nice reading comprehension, dipshit. My mother was only the first psychopathic woman in my life, but unfortunately not the last. ALL women I had to deal with over the last 3 decades turned out to despise me.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:50:57 UTC No. 16162061

>>16162055
> ALL women I had to deal with over the last 3 decades turned out to despise me.
Sounds like the problem might be you.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:51:58 UTC No. 16162063

>>16162055
>>16162040
I'm not "tall and dominant", I'm average height and humble. Still slept with a few dozen in my life and have a wife who loves me.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:54:03 UTC No. 16162066

>>16162061
The "problem" is me being a submissive manlet. I wouldn't call that my problem though. After all it's genetic and can't be changed. It's the women's problem that they treat me with contempt because of it. This is the same pattern as in racism: Treating someone with contempt because of genetic traits he can't change.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:56:41 UTC No. 16162069

>>16162063
>I'm so humble, I brag on 4chan about having sex with a dozen sluts

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:57:34 UTC No. 16162070

>>16162066
So you respond by treating all women with contempt, even abstract theoretical women you have never met or interacted with. Solid plan. Keep us posted on how that works out for you.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 10:58:35 UTC No. 16162071

>>16162069
Imagine thinking that posting anonymously about a very low bodycount in a discussion about sex relations is bragging.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:00:25 UTC No. 16162075

>males arent needed after mating
that explains the rise of single moms looking for a "man" to take responsibility of her and her children's lmao

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:01:02 UTC No. 16162076

>>16162071
>"a few dozen"
>a very low bodycount
Right, you're basically still a virgin.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:03:05 UTC No. 16162078

>>16161901
evolution selects for which works which is why has it selected for men to stay around. stupid 'jak

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:03:24 UTC No. 16162080

>>16162070
This is still a science board. I made empirical observations and formed a predictive hypothesis. The only logical conclusion a smart person naturally draws given the data.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:06:31 UTC No. 16162085

>>16162080
How many fat, ugly girls have you made romantic overtures towards?

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:13:13 UTC No. 16162094

>>16161901
>>Females can always reproduce again and only a very small number of males are needed to fertilise a large number of females
While this is true, there's a small problem. If you have one male, he can create a baby with 1000 different women. But the problem is, those babies would all be half brothers and half sisters. If they tried mating together there's a good chance they'd have defective offspring. Having lots of males increases the variety in the gene pool and lowers the chance of you hooking up with your half sister or something and creating retard babies

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:24:48 UTC No. 16162113

>>16162040
>Apparently my crime consisted in "not being a tall and dominant man"
You again? Look, man, you neeed to break the cycle and stop going for women who remind you of your mother.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:26:25 UTC No. 16162119

>>16162066
>My personality is genetic and unchangeable

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:26:44 UTC No. 16162120

>>16162085
Many. They aren't aware though that they are my looks and status match. They still feel entitled to a dominant tall Chad. In fact, ugly girls seem to have an exaggerated need to compensate for their ugliness by violently denying to be in the same league with unattractive men (see pic rel).

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:28:56 UTC No. 16162123

>>16162120
>Are my views repelling women?
>No, it's the women who are wrong!

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:31:03 UTC No. 16162128

>>16162123
Which views? No woman has ever heard my views because I already get rejected based on my height.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:32:41 UTC No. 16162131

>>16161901
>Applying the rules of natural selection to a civilization building species
Oh no it’s retarded.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:34:26 UTC No. 16162134

>>16162128
>I already get rejected based on my height
Or so you assume. Fact is they can probably smell the desperate bitter incelry on you.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:35:25 UTC No. 16162135

>>16162113
I have yet to see evidence of a woman who isn't like this.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 11:41:33 UTC No. 16162142

>>16162135
That's confirmation bias

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 12:27:00 UTC No. 16162191

>>16162134
Women have absolutely no skill in assessing a man's personality. They go with the most boring, stupid, immature or outright dangerous men - as long as those are tall and dominant.

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 12:57:52 UTC No. 16162211

>>16162191
If they're not going with you they seem to be doing all right

Anonymous at Mon, 6 May 2024 13:15:57 UTC No. 16162232

>Thinks that natural selection works so directly
>Doesn’t realize the difference between R type and K type reproduction and how it changes parenting incentives
>”use up the resources” like the whole point of a civilization is just to have kids and nothing else
The OP has no community

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 04:10:59 UTC No. 16163506

Go back to the sharty

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 05:55:24 UTC No. 16163611

>>16161995
It doesn’t take a very big and mean male to kill a child and rape a woman anon. That argument only stands if the original male stuck around and even then it reads like a cuckold fantasy rather than nature

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 05:56:25 UTC No. 16163612

>>16161998
>men were literal chimps and women built society

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 09:25:10 UTC No. 16163725

>>16162134
>women reject you bc ur an incel, have sex
like clockwork

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 10:48:21 UTC No. 16163782

>>16163725
Incel is a mindset

Anonymous at Tue, 7 May 2024 17:07:06 UTC No. 16164182

>>16162005
swaaws