Image not available

777x451

Boeing-Starliner-....jpg

๐Ÿงต Boeing Starliner launch in 5 hrs!!!

Anonymous No. 16162460

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gH4AOtXzNM4

Anonymous No. 16162469

launch is in more than 9 hours

Anonymous No. 16162499

>>16162460
/sci/borg reporting in

Anonymous No. 16162530

keep the cringe star trek fantasy play in the cringe star trek fantasy play thread
>>16160366

Image not available

1473x1492

1520271817206.jpg

Anonymous No. 16162538

>>16162530
You're nothing special, you do this every time there's a launch.

Anonymous No. 16162553

Place your bets
What will the outcome be?
Scrub?
Failure to reach intended orbit?
Hatch blows out?
Crash into ISS with no survivors?

Anonymous No. 16162559

>>16162553
>Scrub?
If there's any problem with the launch this one is the most likely. For all the problems B*eing has the divisions of its business are largely compartmentalized, so what's happening over in space is separate from aviation.

Image not available

304x166

images.jpg

Anonymous No. 16162577

>>16162469
>launch is in more than 9 hours
No. T-4 hrs now

Anonymous No. 16162589

>>16162577
Do not watch some scam youtube channels

Anonymous No. 16162635

BREAKING NEWS
Door fell off - launch postponed

Anonymous No. 16162992

Bump, launch in almost 30 bings

Anonymous No. 16162993

>>16162992
>10:34 pm EDT (02:34 UTC) Launch.
it's in 4 and half hours for fucks sake

Image not available

422x768

1695572919022809.jpg

Anonymous No. 16162995

>>16162993
>May 6, 6:30 pm EDT (22:30 UTC) Launch coverage begins.
>May 6, 10:34 pm EDT (02:34 UTC) Launch.

Image not available

2625x1884

1705021414979968.jpg

Anonymous No. 16163120

/csm/ reporting in.
mods make a sticky already!

Anonymous No. 16163149

T-3 hours

Image not available

231x300

1428807783086.jpg

Anonymous No. 16163155

>>16163120
>redditsawman

Anonymous No. 16163234

>>16162635
For a second you got me...

Anonymous No. 16163249

it's over

Image not available

1000x750

1000x-1.jpg

Anonymous No. 16163257

SCRUBBED

Anonymous No. 16163299

>>16163234
Anon...

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/06/world/nasa-space-launch-boeing-starliner-scn/index.html

Anonymous No. 16163306

>>16163257
>>16163299
fucking lol

Anonymous No. 16163357

>>16163299
>because of an issue with a valve on the Atlas V rocket
The funny thing about this are the comments complaining about Boeing, when its the ULA booster that's the problem

Anonymous No. 16163450

>>16163357
ULA is half Boeing

Image not available

284x177

ims.jpg

Anonymous No. 16163898

New attempt in 3 days

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gml290-pLQ

Boeingbros, we are gonna make it.

Anonymous No. 16164118

>>16163898
>Boeingbros
>using plural for a single person

Anonymous No. 16164454

>>16163898
>3 days
Looks like it was a fairly minor problem in that case.

Anonymous No. 16164472

>>16164454
>fairly minor problem
I wouldn't trust any Boeing "minor problem"

Anonymous No. 16164653

reminder
>The first crewed test flight test was initially planned to occur in 2017

Anonymous No. 16164681

>>16163898
>Boeingbros
that's pure copium

Image not available

182x166

1712748259457536.jpg

Anonymous No. 16164906

kek