Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 11:03:23 UTC No. 16165606
>>16165587
The light bulb symbolizes ideas and the rainbow symbolizes faggotry. The effect is to condition younger individuals into being homosexual and to normalize deviancy. Consider how many people require light bulbs to be removed from their ass in a given year.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 11:55:42 UTC No. 16165665
>>16165587
>Evaluation: Make and defend judgments based on internal evidence [...]
At last, 'it was revealed to me in a dream' is finally accepted as a thinking skill of the highest order!
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 12:16:10 UTC No. 16165683
>>16165606
>Consider how many people require light bulbs to be removed from their ass in a given year.
I hope you're jesting, but I'm afraid you're not.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 12:23:02 UTC No. 16165696
>>16165683
Well, he obviously is, but just as obviously it's faggotry meant to convince retards that they are intelligent.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 12:25:09 UTC No. 16165699
I’m so tired of fags and trannys. Quite possibly the most obnoxious men on the planet
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 13:19:06 UTC No. 16165779
>>16165587
>What is this bullshit?
What do you mean? It says right on there what it is.
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 19:18:22 UTC No. 16166210
>>16165587
It's for you to cite.
Citations are the meaning of life for the academic.
Keep Bloom's memory alive. He tried really hard to be meaningful
Anonymous at Wed, 8 May 2024 21:34:35 UTC No. 16166436
>What is this bullshit?
Can you defend that judgement based on internal evidence or external criteria or are you a brainlet?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 05:39:56 UTC No. 16166881
>>16166436
NTA, but, it's just that, bullshit. It's impossible to argue against it, because it nas no underlying rationale that could be shown false. Not only it's bullshit, it may even be the most destructive bullshit in history, because it got widely used to design education, and responsible for the split between "book smarts" and real intelligence. Excluding intelligent children, and promoting stupid people who endlesly hope that if they study hard, they will understand but they can't. In that way it may be even worse than the schizophrenic Piaget.
Anonymous at Thu, 9 May 2024 05:41:28 UTC No. 16166882
>>16166436
NTA, but, it's just that, bullshit. It's impossible to argue against it, because it has no underlying rationale that could be shown false. Not only it's bullshit, it may even be the most destructive bullshit in history, because it got widely used to design education, and is responsible for the split between "book smarts" and real intelligence. Excluding intelligent children, and promoting stupid people who endlesly hope that if they study hard, they will understand but they can't. In that way it may be even worse than the schizophrenic Piaget.