Image not available

1200x1200

13-974392045.jpg

๐Ÿงต Post your SAT and ACT scores ITT

Anonymous No. 16168981

Exactly what it says on the tin.
Is /sci/ as smart as they say it is? Let's find out.

Anonymous No. 16169086

ACT : 34 , SAT was only a 1450 super score

Well enough to go to my state university for free and in the honors program. However those scores were a long time ago , before they made it considerably easier

Anonymous No. 16169109

>>16169086
It's fairly impressive if those scores are from before 1995. The re-centering really screwed up the numbers quite a bit.

Anonymous No. 16169112

>>16169109
From the mid 2010s , so not as impressive as i'd hope for- regardless i got me to a pretty good career.

I did have a friend who perfect scored the ACT and the SAT and was a national merit scholar due to his test scores - the dude was unbearably smart. He actually became a national celebrity due to his IMO accolades

I wish i could perform like that

Anonymous No. 16169130

>>16169112
>before they made it considerably easier
When did this happen?

Nathan Rapport No. 16169584

>>16168981
34 ACT and 2340 SAT back in 2010. I was also a national merit finalist and took 9 AP tests, including all 3 physics exams, BC calculus, chemistry, and stats. Averaged 4.5 across all of them. I was a decent athlete too and ran one of the top 50 fastest high school 5k times in Ohio that year. Varsity cross country, tennis, and track.

Anonymous No. 16169594

It's pretty telling none of the DEI admits want to post their stuff.

Anonymous No. 16169667

>>16169130
NTA, but there was a rework of the SAT in 2016 when I took it and it seemed pretty easy

Anonymous No. 16169686

>>16169584
you do anything worthwhile after high school?

Anonymous No. 16169714

>>16169667
When I took it back in 2007, I was under the influence and haven't eaten for two days, and I still managed to score 1500 in non-writing sections.
I can't believe how much they are watering everything down just to placate actual double digit IQ DEI admits.

Anonymous No. 16170004

>>16169686
I had a bit of a shaky start after finishing a degree in physics and applied math but in the past few years things have been turning around and I've got some exciting things in the pipeline now. Stay tuned.

Anonymous No. 16170040

>>16168981
1560 (junior) and then 1600 as senior. Required to take it as a national merit scholar to confirm my award.

Still got rejected by harvard since I'm white and poor tho.

Anonymous No. 16170048

>>16170040
>I'm white and poor tho
Why can't your parents make decent money?

Anonymous No. 16170060

>>16170004
If it's space related, it will be grand.

Anonymous No. 16170094

>>16170048
Why would they need to? So I can go to university with people inferior to me? That was going to happen no matter what.

Anonymous No. 16170614

>>16170094
Interesting take... good luck.

Anonymous No. 16171022

>>16169584
2010 as well
35 ACT, didn't take SAT as a result, but did several SAT subject tests and got 800 on the harder math one. also a 3 year varsity athlete. also took like 10 AP exams and took linear algebra and multivariable calc in high school and qualified for the AIME twice
Guess how many ivies i got into? 0 because im a white boy without rich parents
I am an actuary now doing okay but nothing special

Anonymous No. 16171030

>>16171022
They really kicked off the psychological profiling in Ivy League admissions since early 2000s. I've seen many normal, qualified and competitive peers being rejected, while more ambitious diversity candidates gain acceptance because of the unAmerican political agenda they implemented. They really screen you for compliance as opposed to merit, and admit only those with politically correct alignment that best suits the purposes of whoever is funding the endowment and sitting on the Board of Trustees.
>Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Anonymous No. 16171038

White, male applicants in the lower family income bracket especially got shafted because the agenda setters see that particular demographic as the most dangerous threat to the unAmerican policies they set in motion.
Agenda setters vary in flavor and background, but there are as many traitorous and self-serving crowd in the mix as any diversity appointees.

Anonymous No. 16171060

The number 1 priority is getting rid of malicious diversity crowd in higher education admissions, teaching, and admin positions as soon as possible. The fact that plantation mentality can run deep on both sides of the isle is something malicious third world and chinese communist elements can take advantage of in order to ruin the country as they are doing now. Those demographics in particular have a sense of impunity from loosening of traditional consequences of their actions, as well as social norms and cultures that encourage deception, manipulation, and usurpation as the norm of climbing up the social ladder.
People have to become lucid and self-aware in order to counter the subversion efforts, and also take into account how their personal circumstances can adversely affect their own judgement as well as any efforts to oust the subversives.
One of the key element in the current dynamic is that people who are against the malicious entrenched interests might be mistaking their own positions as being disenfranchised or in the fringes. This is not only false, it's a dangerously unhealthy and weak position to put yourself in. If people can't get past this dynamic personally, they need to work with people among themselves and in the wider all-American population who are. Approaching the entrenched enemies only from the position of rebellious insurgents isn't really most advantageous move you can make, when people are much more than what the plantation politic dynamic bounds them to.

Image not available

684x756

1713424476203893.png

Anonymous No. 16171094

>>16168981
1240, went to state school and now doing a masters in material science @ Ivy