Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 14:02:57 UTC No. 16168995

>>16168984
That they are ours, and this is what happens when you dump literal trillions of dollars into cutting edge defense research for 75+ years.

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 15:12:08 UTC No. 16169091

>>16168984
CGI

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 15:13:55 UTC No. 16169097

>>16168995
>and this is what happens when you dump literal trillions of dollars into cutting edge defense research for 75+ years.

https://youtu.be/zLcJB0IYmaM?si=pzdn7i7j8SvvyzdW

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 16:02:33 UTC No. 16169152

Maybe they're government hoaxes. Or maybe public ones. I was thinking maybe some of the strange properties they have, no obvious propulsion, sudden fast movements etc., could be explained using normal methods. Like in picrel, maybe if you had a tictac ufo tied to a big, extremely fast winch inside a plane or helicopter. Then you could using the winch to draw the tictac toward you really fast. Might work if it's cloudy and the plane with the winch could be above the clouds where it's hidden from view

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 16:11:00 UTC No. 16169175

Slightly kooky but mostly sciency-ish:

https://uaptheory.com/

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 16:18:23 UTC No. 16169196

probably ours, shown through declassified videos to feign ignorance. Other nations look at those videos and say, "Well, it's not us, it must be someone else" and by process of elimination they realize how far behind they are.

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 17:31:56 UTC No. 16169301

>>16168995
This
t. aerospace engineer

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 17:35:45 UTC No. 16169310

>>16169301
You will never be a woman

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 17:36:54 UTC No. 16169311

>>16169175
>mostly sciency-ish
It’s complete bullshit.

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 17:59:43 UTC No. 16169331

>>16169311
Sciency, not science. It’s a speculative theory based on some shreds of data. Doesn’t mean it’s right or wrong. Plus they also threw in a side story about fungi for some reason.
I give it about 50% bullshit, the rest seems sincere but certainly doesn’t mean it’s true.

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 18:15:06 UTC No. 16169346

>>16169331
It’s a load of boloney.
>laser dot moves as if it was inertia-less
>it totally has to be spacetime bending aliens!
I sometimes almost wonder if ‘theories’ like these aren’t intentional disinformation.

Anonymous at Fri, 10 May 2024 18:16:07 UTC No. 16169348

>>16169346
I don’t mean the laser dot in a literal sense, just to be clear.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 00:56:03 UTC No. 16169954

>>16168984
An optical illusion.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 01:40:18 UTC No. 16170011

>>16169175
It's ultra gay. Anti-gravity in not real. It's inertial reduction and therefore a reduction in effective mass. Aerospace fag can confirm. Also, FTL is impossible. What is possible is manipulating the relative permeability and permittivity of the vacuum to artificially raise or lower the maximum speed of c. You can't go faster than light, but you can make light go faster.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 01:53:20 UTC No. 16170030

>>16168984
What makes aliens unscientific?
>but... space big
It is. And you have nooooooooo fucking idea what's out there. Lol. But you will :)

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 01:55:02 UTC No. 16170033

>>16170011
>What is possible is manipulating the relative permeability and permittivity of the vacuum to artificially raise or lower the maximum speed of c. You can't go faster than light, but you can make light go faster.
That's a neat theory and all, but you have no idea what's possible and what's not. You think you do, you tell yourself you do and maybe you're even dumb enough to believe it, but you don't.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 02:05:05 UTC No. 16170045

Aliens

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 02:28:35 UTC No. 16170072

>>16168984
Radar spoofing tech

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 03:42:53 UTC No. 16170172

>>16168984
Every UAP is just something reasonable being misinterpreted by idiots due to the limited amount of data of the particular sample. Things will always exist at the edge of detection range of sensors and they will always look mysterious. There will never be close up footage of such things because if we had more data it'd be obvious what it was to everyone.

That said, many are understood with a bit more investigation. The video OP image is referencing for instance is really just an artifact of the camera's gimbal system (which the government already knew, hence the file name): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsEjV8DdSbs

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 03:45:30 UTC No. 16170179

>>16170172
LMAO

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 03:48:30 UTC No. 16170182

>>16168995
Only a complete moron would believe such stupidity. They pocket the money and waste it on drugs and underage hookers. Simple as.
>>16169301
Fuck off you imbecile parasite.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 03:52:53 UTC No. 16170187

>>16168995
>UFOs in the 19th century
>[no explanation]
>UFOs in the 1940's
>[no explanation]
>UFOs in the Cold War
>[no explanation]
>UFOs in the 2020's
>"Well, obviously they were government drones the whole time."

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 04:50:55 UTC No. 16170240

>>16168995
This is what I think. We proabably have some super advanced drone tech that is being tested on our own military. If the world's most powerful milktary can't track them or shoot them down. What are the chinese or russians going to do?

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 05:39:54 UTC No. 16170311

>>16169152
hmm i remember in the David Fravor JRE tho he had said the sky was clear blue no clouds in sight on the day he saw them

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 12:17:20 UTC No. 16170651

>>16170240
The Russians are doing nothing because
>A) too broke to pursue it
>B) We stole a good portion of the research from their version of Einstein (Yakov Zel'dovich)
Chang is for sure pursuing it. Everytime you read about chinks building a big fucking vacuum binefringing laser, this is the end goal
>>16170182
Yeah, dipshit, the simplest answer is totally aliens.
>>16170187
UFOs in the 1940s and on are actually easily explainable, especially considering we started this in the 1940's. What if instead of aliens, it was really an experimental aircraft, the drive system developed at LANL and the airframe built and operated out of Kirtland Army Air Field. Experimental aircraft crash, and Roswell is awfully close to Kirtland. Fun fact, Kirtland was the only nuclear capable military installation in the world at the time. Nowadays, Kirtland AFB is glownigger central and home to the Space Vehicles and Directed Energy Directorate of the USAF, with direct research labs (Phillips Lab) on site and affiliate Department of Energy projects at nearby Sandia and LANL.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 12:21:47 UTC No. 16170656

>>16170187
And aliens is a cover story the government decided to run with because by that time, we realized that the Russians through Fuchs and the Rosenbergs we're balls deep in our nuclear weapons program.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 12:26:17 UTC No. 16170661

>>16170033
Tell that to this guy...
https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0607418
Or this guy...
https://www.scribd.com/document/208319/NEC-Time-Travel-Experiment-in-2000
Chang even attempted to recruit Leonhardt in 2011

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 12:31:32 UTC No. 16170668

>>16169346
They absolutely are. Jaques Valle was employed by SRI at the time we made up all this dumb "aliens are demons" shit.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 12:37:01 UTC No. 16170672

>>16170187
>Belgian UFO wave
>Soviet Union collapses shortly after
>NATO Supreme Allied Command is in Brussels
It was a flex for Gorbachev, same as sightings in DC in 1952 were a demonstration for Truman.
>The "aliens" don't want you fucking with German reunification, Mikhail

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 14:11:06 UTC No. 16170771

>>16168984
There is none. It is not a scientific problem; science cannot grasp that which is completely beyond our normie grasp of reality, measurement, and its ontological assumptions. Anybody who seriously studies it quickly realized it completely breaks all common scientific rules and barriers of knowledge. The ET hypothesis is nothing more than a cultural smokescreen that is subsumed by the Vallee-ian/Jungian/Platonic pantheistic framework of explanation, i.e our world is more of an illusionary dream world than we could have ever imagined given our dull day to day lives. It will remain a complete anomalous conundrum until something paradigm shattering happens, real or invented/forced.

Anonymous at Sat, 11 May 2024 15:12:44 UTC No. 16170834

>>16170011
>What is possible is manipulating the relative permeability and permittivity of the vacuum to artificially raise or lower the maximum speed of c.
Sure, sure.
Just change the speed of light. Of course sweety.