Image not available

1024x760

1686455628887776.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16169100

threadly reminder /sci/ is an Edison Board.

Anonymous No. 16169103

Edison got burnt hard by established interests.
He was one hell of an experimenter

Image not available

480x606

Db_James_Clerk_Ma....jpg

Anonymous No. 16169106

>>>/diy/ or >>>/toy/
/sci/ is a Maxwell board

Anonymous No. 16169108

>>16169106
Probably more Heaviside

Anonymous No. 16169113

>>16169103
Edison was the darling of established interests.
Tesla was the true genius. He was definitely shafted by the established interest groups.

Anonymous No. 16169117

>>16169113
Nah, Edison got fucked over hard before he finally made it.

Anonymous No. 16169119

>>16169113
>tesla chungus
go back

Anonymous No. 16169123

>>16169119
go back redditard

Anonymous No. 16169125

>>16169100
Wrong, /b/ is the Edison board.

Anonymous No. 16169127

I think I would probably go with Farnsworth or Thomson.

Anonymous No. 16169128

>>16169125
how come

Anonymous No. 16169129

>>16169106
True and /x/ is a Tesla board

Anonymous No. 16169132

>>16169129
I'd have thought /x/ would be Newton?

Anonymous No. 16169136

>>16169106
Thomson or Langmuir

Anonymous No. 16169283

Write a paragraph justifying your proposal

Image not available

636x795

Young Edison.png

Anonymous No. 16169304

I get that Edison fucked over Tesla in a rather shameful manner but people have gone a bit overboard with trying to dismiss Edison's accomplishments due to anger at what he did to Tesla. We should accept that in business he was kind of a dick but in R&D he was quite accomplished.

Anonymous No. 16169308

>>16169304
Accomplished? Yes.
A true genius? No.

Anonymous No. 16169324

>>16169308
Why not a genius?

bodhi No. 16169353

Edison = redit
Tesla = /sci/

any other posts on this topic is cope

Anonymous No. 16169354

>>16169324
he is not a wholesome chungus

Anonymous No. 16169355

>>16169353
/Thread.

bodhi No. 16169377

>>16169355
no doubt whatsoever is Edison was alive today he would do a redit AMA, Tesla would never, he would prefer schizo posting and dunking on psueds here

Anonymous No. 16169383

>>16169377
Edison would be old internet blowing up random shit for a hobby

Anonymous No. 16169385

>>16169377
Tesla is Reddit's atheist God, both Edison and Tesla were mathlet eng*neers and not /sci/entists hence >>16169106

bodhi No. 16169387

>>16169383
electrocuting elephants to death was pretty /sci/ I am forced to admit

Anonymous No. 16169398

>>16169385
>not /sci/entists
what about the hecking alternate current???

Anonymous No. 16169400

>>16169385

If we're going by that metric then maxwell, heaviside and steinmetz are /sci/

Anonymous No. 16169401

>>16169385
Tesla wasn't a mathlet.

Anonymous No. 16169415

>>16169401
He was filtered by Riemannian geometry

Anonymous No. 16169598

Edison was a cocky bastard, more like hackernews retards.
Tesla is redditards favourite.
Oswald Teichmüller is the true /sci/

Anonymous No. 16169615

>>16169598
Tesla is schizo's favourite not normie's. He is almost the part of any conspiracy theory. What a shitty repuatation to leave behind

Anonymous No. 16169663

>>16169615
Well maybe you should ask why mmuch of his research remains sealed and why alexanderson style antennas were suppressed

Image not available

484x594

1715407902651.jpg

Anonymous No. 16170355

/sci/ Boltzmann
you should be able to understand why

Anonymous No. 16170433

>>16170355
no. I dont understand why

Anonymous No. 16170449

>>16170433
he killed himself despite being a genius

Anonymous No. 16170459

>>16170449
what made him sad wasnt math solvable then

Anonymous No. 16170548

You should probably compile field specific representatives and comparisons

Like dianne fossy (/sci/) vs jane goodall (reddit)