Image not available

352x240

asm.webm

๐Ÿงต /mnt/ molecular nanotechnology general

Anonymous No. 16171673

Where the fuck is my assembler edition PART 2
old: >>16157325

Anonymous No. 16171966

bump

Image not available

557x444

Ejs8GlLWoAAHNQY.jpg

Anonymous No. 16171976

>>16171673
When am getting my grey goo and getting off this planet?

Anonymous No. 16172875

>>16171976
next week :-)

Anonymous No. 16173062

>>16171976
fuck a golem and get some robot viruses

Anonymous No. 16173406

bump

Anonymous No. 16173959

>>16171673
it's literally in Canada.

Anonymous No. 16174868

>>16173959
watch this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip6kabvaIpk&ab_channel=ForesightInstitute

If they a molecular assembler, then why are they not scaling up operations? If their molecular assembler is useful why does one of the top employees say that we are nowhere close to complexity of biology.

Don't get me wrong I am honestly impressed with this effort, if what this employee says is true and not misinfo. Despite the flaws, if they can completely prove that position a reactive molecule with atomic precision. Then I think that would be a huge breakthrough and very big step towards legitimizing Drexler's ideas into mainstream acceptance.

Anonymous No. 16175865

bump

Anonymous No. 16176942

>>16171673
whats the spinny thing doing?

Anonymous No. 16177077

>>16174868
They can only move about 50 atoms a day.
>scaling up
Is gonna take months. Probably even longer because of horrible company culture.
>prove
They want to keep everything secret. And that's all I can say

Anonymous No. 16177834

>>16176942
>>16176942
gonna be honest, i have no clue. I think the atoms are being deposited by the rotation.

Anonymous No. 16178586

>>16177834
>>16176942
Depositing atoms to make stuff. Realistic designs probably won't look like this. The meta for nanotech is to make a bunch of shit in parallel. Have a factory that makes a bunch of tiny lego blocks atom by atom, and assemble those blocks in parallel to make stuff. Right now this is still a bit far off

Image not available

1024x768

1715864207416247.jpg

Anonymous No. 16179302

>>16178586
it think their is an animation called 'Productive Nanosystems' from 2006 that describes this.
>pic unreleated