๐งต /mnt/ molecular nanotechnology general
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 03:09:15 UTC No. 16171673
Where the fuck is my assembler edition PART 2
old: >>16157325
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 07:37:10 UTC No. 16171966
bump
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 08:00:01 UTC No. 16171976
>>16171673
When am getting my grey goo and getting off this planet?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 21:28:12 UTC No. 16172875
>>16171976
next week :-)
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 00:16:11 UTC No. 16173062
>>16171976
fuck a golem and get some robot viruses
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 06:03:19 UTC No. 16173406
bump
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:46:04 UTC No. 16173959
>>16171673
it's literally in Canada.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 02:15:35 UTC No. 16174868
>>16173959
watch this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?
If they a molecular assembler, then why are they not scaling up operations? If their molecular assembler is useful why does one of the top employees say that we are nowhere close to complexity of biology.
Don't get me wrong I am honestly impressed with this effort, if what this employee says is true and not misinfo. Despite the flaws, if they can completely prove that position a reactive molecule with atomic precision. Then I think that would be a huge breakthrough and very big step towards legitimizing Drexler's ideas into mainstream acceptance.
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 18:49:41 UTC No. 16175865
bump
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 11:45:35 UTC No. 16176942
>>16171673
whats the spinny thing doing?
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 14:38:55 UTC No. 16177077
>>16174868
They can only move about 50 atoms a day.
>scaling up
Is gonna take months. Probably even longer because of horrible company culture.
>prove
They want to keep everything secret. And that's all I can say
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 02:34:51 UTC No. 16177834
>>16176942
>>16176942
gonna be honest, i have no clue. I think the atoms are being deposited by the rotation.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 17:01:44 UTC No. 16178586
>>16177834
>>16176942
Depositing atoms to make stuff. Realistic designs probably won't look like this. The meta for nanotech is to make a bunch of shit in parallel. Have a factory that makes a bunch of tiny lego blocks atom by atom, and assemble those blocks in parallel to make stuff. Right now this is still a bit far off
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 03:29:29 UTC No. 16179302
>>16178586
it think their is an animation called 'Productive Nanosystems' from 2006 that describes this.
>pic unreleated