Image not available

1280x720

China unveils int....webm

๐Ÿงต China will build all of this on the Moon by 2035

Anonymous No. 16171866

It's time NASA step up their game.

Anonymous No. 16171939

>>16171866
It says the video is corrupt.

Anonymous No. 16171943

>>16171866
Is this supposed to be a video or a still picture? It says webm.

Anonymous No. 16171946

>>16171866
>2035
there won't even be another man on the moon by then

>>16171939
>>16171943
webms have been randomly messing up lately. it's playing for me

Anonymous No. 16172069

>>16171866
chang discovered blender
sigh

Anonymous No. 16172118

>>16171866
They won't even have a rocket that is capable to lift 100+ tonnes into leo by 2035

Anonymous No. 16172128

>>16172118
>rocket that is capable to lift 100+ tonnes into leo
Nobody needs that lol
You are supposed to build with local materials retard cun

Anonymous No. 16172137

>>16172128
Is your brain rotted from too much sci-fi

Image not available

553x826

don't feed Xi.jpg

Anonymous No. 16172143

>>16171866
>China will build all of this on the Moon by 2035
Xi's economy is broken. Record unemployment, mass foreign divestment, real estate market collapse, millions and millions of bankruptcies...
I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's looking very unlikely that Xi will succeed.
Just keep one thing in mind, always: stop putting money in Xi's pockets.

Image not available

1612x1193

broken china.jpg

Anonymous No. 16172241

>>16172143
Hi Peter, how are things at the CIA?

Anonymous No. 16172434

>>16172241
you're not keeping up with things in China lately, are you? I thought so

Anonymous No. 16172443

We have a Starship that can land that entire base in 1 shot if we wanted to.

Anonymous No. 16172446

>>16172434
2 more weeks until collapse?

Anonymous No. 16172449

>>16171866
>China land spaceship on the Moon
>claim that they find no evidence of US landing at apollo site
the fuck is this shit? I've seen it on over Twatter, must be fake news?

Anonymous No. 16172748

I think the moon rabbit will repel the invader, just like in inital landing

Anonymous No. 16172751

>>16172434
Peter keeps me up to date with all the changes, which are always the same as they were the year before.

Anonymous No. 16172763

>>16172449
China has some Pravda type state media aimed at the sort of people who would read the 'Weekly World News' if they were in the US. I don't doubt that one of those papers made that claim about Apollo but am sure the central government didn't make such a claim.
Back when people were claiming that Three Gorges Dam was about the burst because satellite imagery showed it bowing out, Chinese tabloids claimed it was designed to bow. This was meant to reassure commoners that everything is ok because the real answer, that satellite images are composites with all kinds of artifacts and other distortions would be too difficult for the target audience to understand.

Anonymous No. 16172787

>>16171866
where are they going to find that much paper mache and trash on the moon to build those from?

Anonymous No. 16172792

>>16172446
>putin would never invade ukraine, its just saber rattling, drumpft, /pol/, low iq, capitalism got us here

Anonymous No. 16172795

>>16171866
The area to colume ration of those buildings are not credible.

Anonymous No. 16172796

keep the star trek fantasy play in the star trek fantasy play containment thread
>>>/sci/sfg/

Anonymous No. 16173722

>>16171866

Cool, I personally can't wait for the new wave of Chinese industrial disaster and accident videos we'll get from this. Absolute kino on the horizon boys.

Image not available

500x653

Mao sparrows.jpg

Anonymous No. 16173760

>>16172446
I didn't say China would collapse, I said Xi's finance spreadsheet isn't looking good, at all.

Anonymous No. 16173763

>>16172751
On the contrary, I informed you of very little, Maybe you should go and try to fill in the rest.

Anonymous No. 16173852

>>16173763
The person making the assertion that a particular country is about to collapse should provide the data proving the collapse is going to happen. If they instead demand everyone else to provide data proving the claimed coming collapse isn't going to happen, they're doing so because they've based their assertion on faith, not knowledge.

Anonymous No. 16173864

>>16173852
Its just simple demographics bwo

Anonymous No. 16173869

>>16171866
I believe it when I see it, or something like that

Anonymous No. 16173888

>>16172443
Hell no, starship needs AT LEAST 20 refueling to get to the moon

Anonymous No. 16173895

>>16173888
>AT LEAST 20 refueling
>carries 150 tons to LEO
>can carry at most 1500 tons of propellant if its streched
You're retarded