🧵 I hate pop-science
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 16:55:39 UTC No. 16172520
Bill Nye, Neil Tyson, Carl Sagan and the rest of them. We get it, humans are made of stardust. Why don't you study something actually important or controversial like race and IQ.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 16:59:50 UTC No. 16172526
>>16172520
>Why don't you study something actually important or controversial like race and IQ.
Thank you for speaking up for all us pop science haters. I feel so represented rn
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 17:03:23 UTC No. 16172535
>>16172520
how else would I understand science?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 17:58:27 UTC No. 16172583
>>16172535
read a book
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 18:25:54 UTC No. 16172615
>>16172520
>important
not sure if serious, but bye
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 00:12:03 UTC No. 16173056
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 18:11:35 UTC No. 16174240
>>16172520
bsm and obama's wife are both trannys so it makes u wonder did obama and bsm fuck?
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 05:37:45 UTC No. 16175047
>>16174240
If they did, NDT was the bottom
Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 09:34:34 UTC No. 16175244
>>16172520
You literally ARE the IQ level of the pop-sci crowd, lol.
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 00:10:08 UTC No. 16176401
>>16172520
>Why don't you study something actually important or controversial like race and IQ.
Black Soiyence Man can't do that because he is low IQ. One of the unfortunate ironies of the race vs IQ situation is that negroes are incapable of comprehending it as a result of their genetically limited intellectual capabilities
sage at Wed, 15 May 2024 00:49:07 UTC No. 16176441
>>16172520
>>16176401
both of you are unintelligent 17 year old incel kids who recently found 4chan and /pol/.
don't post on /sci/ again.
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 20:57:59 UTC No. 16177454
>>16176441
you're the only one here thats obsessed with /pol/
Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 21:02:09 UTC No. 16177464
>>16174240
What if it's one of those masonic gender invert couples?
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 06:31:43 UTC No. 16177996
>>16172520
Tyson is too dumb to do any sort of science, he couldn't get a handle on calculus so figuring out race vs IQ is out of his league for sure, too much math involved in all those IQ distributions. Thats why he left science to become a popcorn salesman
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:41:38 UTC No. 16178960
>>16175244
you are
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 21:46:31 UTC No. 16178969
>>16172520
Their job is to convince you that "scientists" are some kind of wizard you should just trust because science bro.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 08:01:25 UTC No. 16179525
>>16178969
And that is part of an effort to steer people away from their more reliable and solid traditional belief systems and trap them into scyence atheism, which can be changed at a whim top down because "the scyence has changed".
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 14:45:09 UTC No. 16179967
>>16176441
Rent free
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:50:56 UTC No. 16180031
>>16172520
Short version - As much as we all get irked by popsci faggots, the bottom line is that 99% of the human race don't get their cocks out (or their checkbooks) for binary light curve measurements or Langmuir probe sweeps or particle pair correlation plots like scientists do.
Non-scientists have to be persuaded that all this science shit that they don't understand well enough to see how it impacts their daily lives is still worth taking a big bite out of their paycheck to fund, and popsci faggots do that by (for lack of a nicer way of saying it) trying to dumb down the material in a way that doesn't come off as patronizing to laypersons.
Where it becomes a problem is when the popsci faggots think their ability to translate research for laypersons makes them equivalent to actual researchers or puts them in some kind of special position to dictate what government policy on research should be. NDT is particularly bad about this, and buys into his own PR too much.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 15:56:49 UTC No. 16180039
>>16180031
The problem is that normies now think these entertainers are top of the field experts and associate their likeness to scientific authority, leading even worse retards like musk or the hundreds of "science" channels on youtube also gaining credibility. Pop science has made people stupider
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 05:03:20 UTC No. 16181013
>>16175047
Tyson nuggets tranny confirmed?
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 20:58:18 UTC No. 16181979
>>16181013
he the zestiest man in science
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 17:56:37 UTC No. 16183031
>>16180039
the """professionals""" you respect are all just as stupid as BSM
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 05:32:24 UTC No. 16183961
>>16183031
those " top of the field experts" are the ones who ridiculously deemed tyson worthy of a phd
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 05:35:37 UTC No. 16183968
>>16172520
>Why don't you study something actually important or controversial like race and IQ.
Why don't you go back to your containment board, Hernandez?
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 14:53:26 UTC No. 16184588
>>16172520
I feel you anon but its probably good that they exist, otherwise low IQ cavemens would never be interested in science and it would have even less support.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 00:52:21 UTC No. 16185386
>>16183961
He was worthy of a PhD, cause PhDs are worth shit
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:14:28 UTC No. 16185630
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 21:39:08 UTC No. 16186807
>>16185630
>le movie theater manager face