Image not available

1200x575

7479126718680.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16172544

Where are all the Aliens !?

Anonymous No. 16172545

>>16172544 Some on/close of Earth. Here's why (Pro/Con) https://www.kialo.com/most-likely-or-correct-explanation-for-uap--ufos-63205
For the rest, I guess mostly on exoplanets.

Anonymous No. 16172714

All intelligent species eventually kill themselves out of boredom

Anonymous No. 16172838

>>16172544
Area 51, stop asking.

Barkon No. 16172840

>>16172838
You can all join my civ after and be.

Anonymous No. 16173526

>>16172544
At least 53 alien civilizations are currently busy constructing their Dyson Spheres
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkEGvmfd8dI

Anonymous No. 16173533

>>16172544
already here. they are called women

Image not available

500x209

2d0bf5b4c4f75f2e8....gif

Cult of Passion No. 16173576

>>16173533
>sniff sniff...
>NOT MOMMY! H-ISSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!

Anonymous No. 16173897

What if neutrinos are sent from beings elsewhere in the universe, and all they do is collect information for said beings? After retrieving the information from the neutrinos, these beings are then able to recreate our world within theirs, allowing them to study it without travelling

Image not available

900x1440

22550288_86341039....jpg

Anonymous No. 16173909

>>16172544
>Where are all the Aliens !?
filtered out
https://phys.org/news/2024-05-ai-blame-failure-contact-alien.html

Anonymous No. 16174215

>>16172544
Earth and humanity have been infected by mind controlling parasites. The galactic council has quarantined the solar system until further notice. Any attempts at contact by sentient life, from within the system, should be considered a parasite trick. Do not engage. Thank you for you understanding and cooperation.

Anonymous No. 16175095

The comments section of the latest JMG video about Dyson Spheres is quite amusing. I've never seen JMG so active in responding to critical comments before.

Anonymous No. 16176370

>>16173526 link to study pls

Anonymous No. 16176382

>>16173909 Yes but not at their source but here, locally