Image not available

2610x1678

Capture.png

๐Ÿงต Quantum Electrodynamics is a fraud?

Anonymous No. 16172826

Is he right, anon? Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvz4MRpq6xs

Anonymous No. 16172888

>>16172826
>Quantum Electrodynamics
Is a hack, not a fraud. A hack comparable to a ghetto fix: Is not elegant, is not meant to be the definitive solution, is just what our limited understanding can provide right now.

Anonymous No. 16172903

> Is he right
No. Such calculations are done with computers today and give even more accurate results.

Anonymous No. 16172946

>>16172903
>Such calculations are done with computers today and give even more accurate results
that doesn't invalidate anything he said in the video tho

Anonymous No. 16173372

>>16172946
Nobody cares about that highschool teacher. He gor publicly humiliated by Edward Witten

Anonymous No. 16173587

>>16173372
Midwitten got humiliated by reality and string theory is a waste of time and paper

Anonymous No. 16173703

>>16172826
Not watching that. If you have a paper for me to read, I'll read it.
>>16172888
Can you rewrite that in English?
>>16173587
Qed isn't string theory

Anonymous No. 16174154

>>16172826
1950? I thought it was calculated first in 1948 by Schwinger, based on the ideas of renormalization of Baron Ernst Carl Gerlach Stueckelberg von Breidenbach zu Breidenstein und Melsbach. Feynman diagrams are just a shortcut to write integrals easier, but the real challenge was always how to evaluate them and not get infinities

Image not available

455x480

455px-Vertex_corr....png

Anonymous No. 16174509

>>16172826
Feynman diagrams show explicit evidence of FTL particles, yet nobody ever acknowledges this

Anonymous No. 16174512

>>16174509
>evidence of FTL particles
explain please?

Anonymous No. 16174566

>>16174512
Squiggly lines = light
Arrows = electron
The electron is moving a greater distance than the photon does in the same amount of time

Anonymous No. 16174589

>>16174566
I don't believe the distance in the diagram is meant to be taken in a literal sense

Anonymous No. 16174601

>>16174589
The vertical axis is literally time. It clearly depicts an electron emitting a photon, delfecting to the right, emitting another photon, deflecting to the left, than recapturing that same photon in the time it took to deflectits way through space.

There is no way of formulating this without either A) acknowledging FTL or B) gaslighting with "muh mathematical abstraction"

Anonymous No. 16174605

>>16174601
Show me the electron moving faster than light in real life

Image not available

1746x926

serious challenges.png

Anonymous No. 16174655

>>16172826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeGrcZMJ8uM

Anonymous No. 16174666

>>16174605
Electrons are invisible numbnuts