๐งต Quantum Electrodynamics is a fraud?
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 20:45:54 UTC No. 16172826
Is he right, anon? Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvz
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 21:35:01 UTC No. 16172888
>>16172826
>Quantum Electrodynamics
Is a hack, not a fraud. A hack comparable to a ghetto fix: Is not elegant, is not meant to be the definitive solution, is just what our limited understanding can provide right now.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 21:45:36 UTC No. 16172903
> Is he right
No. Such calculations are done with computers today and give even more accurate results.
Anonymous at Sun, 12 May 2024 22:28:30 UTC No. 16172946
>>16172903
>Such calculations are done with computers today and give even more accurate results
that doesn't invalidate anything he said in the video tho
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:30:42 UTC No. 16173372
>>16172946
Nobody cares about that highschool teacher. He gor publicly humiliated by Edward Witten
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 09:38:03 UTC No. 16173587
>>16173372
Midwitten got humiliated by reality and string theory is a waste of time and paper
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 11:26:52 UTC No. 16173703
>>16172826
Not watching that. If you have a paper for me to read, I'll read it.
>>16172888
Can you rewrite that in English?
>>16173587
Qed isn't string theory
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 17:08:07 UTC No. 16174154
>>16172826
1950? I thought it was calculated first in 1948 by Schwinger, based on the ideas of renormalization of Baron Ernst Carl Gerlach Stueckelberg von Breidenbach zu Breidenstein und Melsbach. Feynman diagrams are just a shortcut to write integrals easier, but the real challenge was always how to evaluate them and not get infinities
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:06:07 UTC No. 16174509
>>16172826
Feynman diagrams show explicit evidence of FTL particles, yet nobody ever acknowledges this
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:07:09 UTC No. 16174512
>>16174509
>evidence of FTL particles
explain please?
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:27:05 UTC No. 16174566
>>16174512
Squiggly lines = light
Arrows = electron
The electron is moving a greater distance than the photon does in the same amount of time
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:42:24 UTC No. 16174589
>>16174566
I don't believe the distance in the diagram is meant to be taken in a literal sense
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC No. 16174601
>>16174589
The vertical axis is literally time. It clearly depicts an electron emitting a photon, delfecting to the right, emitting another photon, deflecting to the left, than recapturing that same photon in the time it took to deflectits way through space.
There is no way of formulating this without either A) acknowledging FTL or B) gaslighting with "muh mathematical abstraction"
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 21:57:06 UTC No. 16174605
>>16174601
Show me the electron moving faster than light in real life
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 22:45:25 UTC No. 16174655
>>16172826
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeG
Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 22:50:06 UTC No. 16174666
>>16174605
Electrons are invisible numbnuts