Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 02:58:01 UTC No. 16173232

>>16173224
Learn how to spell and punctuate you quadruple nigger.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 03:12:11 UTC No. 16173247

>>16173232
im esl retard
do you feel proud after making your worthless comment?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 03:28:31 UTC No. 16173257

>>16173224
>covarying coupling constants
i.e. 'let's solve the dark matter conundrum by just assuming G, c, and h can arbitrarily fluctuate by however much is necessary to eliminate the need for dark matter while ignoring the myriad of other effects this would have on the physical world'

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 03:53:50 UTC No. 16173278

>>16173257
yeah way more plausible that the numbers are fixed because ..... God?
why those specific numbers? why are they so special?
the constants varying on top of eliminating dark matter eliminate the need of an inteligent designer chosing the specific values and the retarded fine tuning argument

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 03:58:47 UTC No. 16173282

>>16173224
The only explanation that makes sense are billions of advanced civilizations hidden in the void. The forest is dark and full of terrors.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 04:34:45 UTC No. 16173308

>>16173282
>bot post off-topic

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 06:09:51 UTC No. 16173421

>>16173224
>Rajendra Gupta
what if dark matter is poo hidden in loo?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 11:17:16 UTC No. 16173688

>>16173278
>why are they so special?
they're not, our mind just interprets things as such, in our quest for meaning.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 15:01:23 UTC No. 16173985

>>16173224
I'll let someone else answer this in the best way possible that I could find
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uYB9KOYGuk

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 22:24:45 UTC No. 16174629

>>16173985
this midwit what no idea of what he talk about 90% of the time

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 22:49:31 UTC No. 16174664

>New model cooked up last year pass test after test matching observation of JWST.
Nope. The test is nonsense. He assumes all galaxies always had the same size, despite the fact that they have a finite age. It is as stupid as assuming all people have the same height and therefore disproving euclidian geometry.
Garbage assumptions in, garbage results out.

>Drak matter doesnt exist.
His model doesn't explain rotation curves, galaxy clusters, structure formation, the cosmic microwave background or big bang nucleosyntheis. It explains none of the key tests of dark matter. He literally looked at one single test and then when off to the media to sell this shit to gullible people like you.

And what is this new model? He has taken out dark matter and now needs tired light and caring fundamental constants. Removing one assumption and replacing it with 2 more is not an upgrade.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 22:52:33 UTC No. 16174670

>>16173224
>Raj
>Gupta
Can't make this shit up

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:00:46 UTC No. 16174684

>>16173224
Don't let dark matter sneak up on you.
>>16174664
CMBR is made up.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:22:21 UTC No. 16174703

>>16174684
>CMBR is made up.
This is flat earth level reasoning>>16174670
. The CMB definitely exist, has been. Studied by hundreds of instruments. It has also been used as a backlight to discover hundred of confirmed galaxy clusters, which would be impossible if there was no CMB.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:29:54 UTC No. 16174712

>>16173224
>muh age of the universe
>muh dark matter

Whatever, the significance of these topics for our lifes is basically zero.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:36:58 UTC No. 16174726

>>16174712
>actual low iq comments
go back turning burgers and wagying your life away. I know thinking take too much brain power for you

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:38:08 UTC No. 16174728

>>16174664
sorry hun occam razor favor the new model over the imaginary nigga matter

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:40:51 UTC No. 16174734

>>16174728
Nope. It has more assumptions and has less explanatory power.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:47:59 UTC No. 16174736

>>16174734
no. requiring that the fundemental numbers of the universe stay constant over billions of years is a unwritten assumption

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 23:59:37 UTC No. 16174744

>>16174736
What actually matters is the number of free parameters. That is how complexity is defined in terms of statistics, how flexible is a model to fit any data. Fixing something at some value does not give your model any freedom. But if now you fit for that as a free parameter the model is more flexible, more complex. Then you add a time depence, that's two parameters (at least).
And you skipped over the point that he also needs Tired Light, which has no physical basis either. His mode combines expansion, tired light and varying constants. It is totally overcomplicated.
And there are measurements of the fine structure constant in the past which indicate very little change could have happend.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 00:15:03 UTC No. 16174757

>>16174744
>Tired Light, which has no physical basis either
completly wrong

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 00:18:55 UTC No. 16174760

>>16174757
So what known mechanism can cause redshift without scattering the light in angle or having wavelength depence?

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 00:51:12 UTC No. 16174791

>>16174760
so this model has to explained how that mechanism work but for the lambda cdm model we just have to accept dark matter exist without knowing at all what is.
sound like double standards to me

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 01:43:47 UTC No. 16174836

>>16174791
model deez nuts

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 03:49:07 UTC No. 16174943

>>16174836
You are TOO FUCKING STUPID to have a normal conversation like a normal fucking person and we don't have a microscope powerful enough to measure your tiny fucking balls attached to your deformed dick you utter nepo retard cunt.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:05:56 UTC No. 16174962

>>16174791
NTA but there's a difference between a model that relies on some material that affects things in ways we already understand and completely new unobserved, unjustified physical interactions. Nobody has to ask why dark matter makes galaxies rotate faster because the reason already exists in our current understanding of gravity.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:06:20 UTC No. 16174964

>>16173278
>The only possible need for their to be consistent intrinsic qualities in our universe is MUH GOD
That has nothing to do with this. If there are no intrinsic qualities in our universe and any fundamental constant could change at any moment for any reason then we might as well take all of science and just throw it in the fucking trash, because any fucking second the Planck constant could apparently just double and all normal atomic and nuclear reactions in the Universe could suddenly stop working.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:06:57 UTC No. 16174965

>>16174791
Also still NTA, model deez nuts

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:16:27 UTC No. 16174974

>>16174962
ok so what actually is dark matter
you can't just say you understand how it generate gravity without knowing what it actually is
Is it a particule? radiation? some new thing?
we actually know next o nothing about it

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:19:09 UTC No. 16174976

>>16174964
>any fucking second the Planck constant could apparently just double
not if it happen on cosmic time and the other constant change proportiannaly to keep interaction working the same way time and distance change to keep the speed of light the same in all frames

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 04:38:33 UTC No. 16174983

>>16174974
>so what actually is dark matter
we don't know - it's a placeholder for something that might exist and would explain a lot of things very simply, but which we haven't yet discovered (if it does exist)

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 08:40:04 UTC No. 16175210

>>16174791
It doesn't have to be known for certain but you can't even give an example mechanism of how it could work without violating basic physical laws. On the other hand there are multiple detailed dark matter candidates which are still plausible, e.g. axions and sterile neutrinos.
Remember that tired light is a century old idea. In that time people have still never come up with any serious hypothesis. Much longer than peole have been looking for DM.