Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 09:39:00 UTC No. 16173589

>>16173544
It shows that the classification into "races" based on outward characteristics is an artificial one, based ultimately more on social and cultural conventions than biological reality.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 13:04:30 UTC No. 16173835

>>16173544
This post again, did you not get your answers last time?
Trolling isn't allowed here, you know?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 16:46:38 UTC No. 16174131

>>16173544
I'll bite

black male, white male

white male, white female

between which pair is more genetic diversity?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 18:57:02 UTC No. 16174328

>>16173544
That statement is regarding the variation of genes on chromosomes. What it ignores is allele repeats and epigentics.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 19:36:06 UTC No. 16174376

>>16173589
As opposed to inward characteristics like personality?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 19:38:28 UTC No. 16174380

>>16173544
The debate on the existence of races is boring and obsolete. It doesnt matter. Within a single family you can find subhumans and gifted people too, good looking and smart people can have a retarded brother or sister. Point is, you can call for eugenics and the culling of inferior people regardless of a concept of race.
People will naturally otherize others over the slightest difference, like some theological disagreement over a random biblical passage.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 19:43:45 UTC No. 16174388

>>16173544
Within the Dutch you have 170 IQ geniuses and 50 IQ retards. But the average IQ difference between Dutch and Pygmies is only 40 IQ points. Now let them in, goy

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 19:52:14 UTC No. 16174395

>>16173544
The claim here is that there is greater genetic variance within your phenotype than there is between the averages of your and another phenotype.
The reasoning behind the race argument is that genetic differences between races ought to be greater than within one race. Thus there can not be a race that satisfies the claim mentioned above.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 19:58:15 UTC No. 16174403

>>16173544
My best guess is that this was an ANOVA test done to detect racial differences, and they didn't find any. I don't know what study they are refferring to and what was being measured. It seems like races can be biologically validated with with PCAs done on SNP data. Don't know what the input matrix exactly is though even though the meme is spammed here daily.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 20:18:59 UTC No. 16174435

>>16173544
It's nonsense. A group can have a large amount of variation within it and still have an identifiable characteristic that differentiates it from another group.

Imagine a box full of dice. All dice have a random number of sides and are marked with a random combination of letters and numbers. If the dice are either made of metal or wood a magnet will sort them just fine.