Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:07:38 UTC No. 16173927

>>16173865
>look like a sperg
What do 'spergs' look like?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:45:44 UTC No. 16173957

>>16173927

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:47:36 UTC No. 16173961

>>16173865
Accept that you have not made a discovery

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:48:16 UTC No. 16173963

>>16173961
>hypothetically

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 14:52:29 UTC No. 16173971

>>16173957
I know who that is, but he looks like a normal person. Maybe "look" isn't the right verb for what you were trying to express.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 15:38:11 UTC No. 16174043

>>16173971
Yeah, anon probably meant "to not sound like someone who said Martians built the pyramids".

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 16:28:19 UTC No. 16174112

>>16174043
In that case, the anon needs to be precise with his word selection. That would be my first tip for him.

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 16:33:51 UTC No. 16174121

>>16174112
Understandable. Regarding the newfound definition, nevertheless, what would be your intellectual contribution?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 17:01:33 UTC No. 16174148

>>16173865
Let me guess, you discovered that Christ is king?

Anonymous at Mon, 13 May 2024 18:21:26 UTC No. 16174265

>>16174148
>independent source moment

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 05:19:59 UTC No. 16175020

If the discovery risks being spoiled by a few lines of actual clarification it probably isn't significant. Post an abstract. Hard to give general advice without knowing anything about what it is you actually claim to have discovered.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 06:01:15 UTC No. 16175078

>>16174121
>Regarding the newfound definition
What definition? Was something defined in this thread? I don't understand.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 14:01:06 UTC No. 16175496

>>16173865
>no higher education
Anon, just promote your idea under a sensationalistic book and sell it online. You ain't getting nothing otherwise, independently whether it's true.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 19:53:46 UTC No. 16175948

>>16173865
>to not look like a sperg
Revise your goals. That one is stupid and makes no sense.

Anonymous at Tue, 14 May 2024 21:33:27 UTC No. 16176141

>>16174121
>>16175078
Hey, I wasn't mocking or shutting you down. I'm just asking because first you mentioned a "discovery", and then (assuming you are the OP), you mentioned a "definition", so I'm confused, legitimately.
Did you mean the same thing?