Image not available

572x600

socrates-louvres.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16174359

Why aren't metaphysics considered scientific on /sci/? Physicalism is a dead end.

Image not available

830x878

1715628498151.png

Anonymous No. 16174364

Philosoplebs have been cucked out of their own field by mathematicians and physicists. You need to know at least formal logic, quantum mechanics, relativity, stochastic processes, game theory, theory of computation, information theory etc etc before talking about metaphysics. If your idea of metaphysics relies on a computable, deterministic universe with local hidden variables in absolute time then it is simply factually wrong. Philosoplebs are not even aware anymore of all the established facts and proven theorems contradicting their bullshit.

Barkon No. 16174375

>>16174364
And this is a mental slave and or slaver posting is military enforced propaganda which he profits off socially and financially

Anonymous No. 16174383

>>16174359
They are. The Theory of Relativity is accepted despite never being proven.

Anonymous No. 16174449

>>16174383
>The Theory of Relativity
Which theory of relativity? The general one or the other?

Anonymous No. 16174455

>>16174359
Physicalism is a metaphysic and it is the one held by most philosophers and almost all scientists

Anonymous No. 16174526

>>16174455
>Physicalism is a metaphysic
In English, doc.
>held by most philosophers and almost all scientists
This doesn't say anything. All I'll say is physics is metaphysics, but metaphysics is not physics.

Anonymous No. 16174537

>>16174526
My English was perfect, you just have reading problems

Anonymous No. 16174538

>>16174359
metaphysics aren't considered science because you can't use scientific method to answer metaphysical questions.
it's called "meta" (aka "after") physics for a reason.

Anonymous No. 16174544

>>16174537
ESL detected

Anonymous No. 16174555

>>16174538
Do you ever wonder what makes the scientific method itself possible? That's what metaphysics are all about.
>>16174544
Checked

Anonymous No. 16174561

>>16174538
It's called Metaphysics because Aristotle wrote some books after his Physics book and his students didn't know what to call these books

Anonymous No. 16174564

>>16174555
the scientific method accept a certain metaphysical view as an axiom and try to answer questions from there. it doesn't and it cannot answer metaphysical questions.
only philosophy tries to (but failed to) answer metaphysical questions.

Anonymous No. 16174565

>>16174538
>it's called "meta" (aka "after") physics for a reason
Lmao

Anonymous No. 16174570

>>16174561
>>16174565
laugh all you want retards.
solve physics completely before attempting harder problem morons.

Anonymous No. 16174577

>>16174544
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/metaphysic

Anonymous No. 16174579

>>16174564
You are even more ignorant than the pleb you're replying to.

Anonymous No. 16174591

>>16174579
tell me then, cattle brain. show me my ignorance. don't insult and run away like the little maggot you are.

Anonymous No. 16174788

>>16174359
Cuz >>>/his/ exists.

bodhi No. 16174812

>>16174359
this board is the lowest of the low plebians, they dont know anything outside 101/102 level undergrad textbooks and they barely understand any of that

Image not available

4160x3120

20240513_191938.jpg

Anonymous No. 16174816

>>16174812
I have six books of euclid written in my own manuscript, I have proven myself and am absolved of your charge

bodhi No. 16174824

>>16174816
I said the "board" not everyone on it. If it was completely hopeless and filled with nothing but fools I wouldnt be here (most likely. I do enjoy trolling morons though. it is one of the simple pleasures)

Anonymous No. 16174826

>>16174824
Can you mathematically explain that with set theory