Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 08:11:01 UTC No. 16176807

What's the problem?

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 08:19:00 UTC No. 16176815

>All fields considered below are supposed commutative.
Why is this worth mentioning? A "non-commutative field" is by definition not a field but a skew-field or a division ring.

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 08:51:39 UTC No. 16176827

third paragraph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_ring

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 08:56:53 UTC No. 16176833

>>16176815
It was a different time

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 10:03:10 UTC No. 16176880

>>16176804
>he thought the title of a graduate math book matched the contents

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 10:20:52 UTC No. 16176883

I am having flashbacks to my M.Sc.

Anonymous at Wed, 15 May 2024 10:58:25 UTC No. 16176902

>>16176880
kek