Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 11:56:41 UTC No. 16178279
>>16178273
it's not base 1 though.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 12:04:10 UTC No. 16178287
>>16178273
I hate how zoomers have decided that simple rationality is cringe/midwit/soi. Fuck this generation
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 12:18:58 UTC No. 16178302
>>16178273
it's not base 1 but it is a true statement if you interpret the context to be concatenation with strings of decimal digits (this would be the natural interpretation in the context of formal languages)
Cult of Passion at Thu, 16 May 2024 12:27:24 UTC No. 16178309
>>16178287
>I hate how kids wear their hats wrong. Its a purpose built device, not a fashion accesory!
I fucking hate Gen-X.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 12:37:24 UTC No. 16178324
>>16178287
Theyre a nigger generation
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 13:09:58 UTC No. 16178348
>>16178273
Base 1? The 145 IQ one should be also on the left side kek
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 13:10:04 UTC No. 16178349
>>16178273
the real midwit is the one who posts memes like this. I was considering these wuestions (dereferencing pointers, and so on) before the age of 7.
t. 160iq
Cult of Passion at Thu, 16 May 2024 15:35:47 UTC No. 16178487
>>16178349
>t. 160iq
Whatchya work on?
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 17:18:16 UTC No. 16178608
>>16178279
1 is certainly the base here. Now it's true that in the usual base-n notation we use the numbers 0 through n-1 as digits, but that's not the only choice we can make. For example, using 1 through n has the nice property that there's exactly one way to write any positive integer. Another notable choice is -(n-1) through n-1; this one is useful for expressing various calculation tricks (such as the trick for multiplying by 9) and also makes arithmetic with infinite radix-point numbers nice (of course this only works well when n >= 2). For base 1 the most common choice of digits is {1} since {0} is obviously useless. This person is using a digit set that at the very least includes {1,2,3,4,5,6}.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:17:49 UTC No. 16179383
>>16178608
>This person is using a digit set that at the very least includes {1,2,3,4,5,6}.
Which means its not base-1, its at least base-6 if there are six unique symbols representing different values.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:09:39 UTC No. 16179619
>>16179383
Not necessarily. Having a set of digits larger than the base is possible; it just means (assuming your base is a positive integer and your digits are integers) that there will be some numbers that can be represented in multiple equivalent ways. Having a set of digits smaller than your base is a bigger problem, since it guarantees (under the same assumptions as before, and also assuming we're not using a radix point) that some positive integers will not be representable.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 10:51:31 UTC No. 16179651
>>16178273
it's not base 1 you doofus, it's either base exp(2i pi/3), exp(-2i pi/3), -1 + i sqrt(2) or -1 - i sqrt(2)
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:12:14 UTC No. 16179664
>>16179619
What are some examples of actual mathematical bases that are anything like you describe?
And don't just try to make up more bullshit on the spot, I mean cite something that has ever actually been used the way you describe.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:29:59 UTC No. 16179678
>>16179383
It's me from >>16178279
I see your point.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:56:01 UTC No. 16179705
>>16178273
But they're all wrong.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 12:10:52 UTC No. 16179721
>>16179664
You were already given perfectly good examples, but if you insist on seeing other people using such systems here are a bunch of links you could have found yourself by searching for "signed digits":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redun
https://gentzen.wordpress.com/2019/
https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/
https://redirect.cs.umbc.edu/~phata
https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15702
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:11:13 UTC No. 16180807
>>16178309
>I hate how kids wear their hats wrong
Yes. It's done by nigs because they have low IQ and don't understand how objects work. The newer generation is shit, cry about it more.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:26:06 UTC No. 16180824
>>16178287
not my problem
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 01:27:37 UTC No. 16180825
>>16178273
Not base 1. Anyone attempting to justify it saying "umm ackchually" belongs firmly at the peak
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 02:13:08 UTC No. 16180852
>>16180825
um actually it works because I say it does and there's no reason it can't work like that
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:26:05 UTC No. 16180977
>>16179664
Greek numerals
Cult of Passion at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:51:52 UTC No. 16181003
>>16179664
>make up more bullshit on the spot
lol
"Train? No."
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 05:04:50 UTC No. 16181014
>>16178487
Not him. I have a psychologist tested IQ of 160 and I work on nothing worthwhile. I subsist trading time for money. Operative word, subsist. Enough to survive. As such my mind is racked and taxed with making economizing decisions. It can never be put to any good use for myself. I regret ever learning anything at all.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 05:58:52 UTC No. 16181092
>>16180824
pre-dark age is the most fun time to be alive, because new and old superstitions appear, the skill to understand complex machines and the tools to build them becomes arcane and esoteric, and random violence begins to become the norm as all institutions become corrupt and the law of the jungle returns. magic re-enters the world, and this is a good thing.
Cult of Passion at Sat, 18 May 2024 06:43:41 UTC No. 16181130
>>16181014
All you had to do was use you autism to focus on a hobby until you were such an expert you tell the creators of it how it should have been made.
My job is my hobby...I never work...I subsist on little so I can fund my hobby and my job.
Cult of Passion at Sat, 18 May 2024 06:46:38 UTC No. 16181132
>>16181014
Even if its something stupid like a video game or some shit, getting "proficient" at something helps with mental health by telling your subconscious you actual place in the world.
>As such my mind is racked and taxed with making economizing
Because this is whats important right now...you need something more important than "now".
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 07:22:43 UTC No. 16181148
>>16178287
>simple rationality is cringe/midwit/soi
It really is though.
The low end can be right for the wrong reasons.
The high end can be right for the right reasons.
The middle is wrong for the right reasons (herd mentality).
Only the tails will produce new patterns. The middle just safely copies/reproduces the status quo.
Cult of Passion at Sat, 18 May 2024 07:33:23 UTC No. 16181158
>>16181148
Its literally juat metaphysical interpretations of energy exchanges no different that Thermoeconomics professor or a Many-Moons Sage Witchress (penised).
All is One.
Cult of Passion at Sat, 18 May 2024 07:38:54 UTC No. 16181161
>>16181158
>or a Many-Moons Sage Witchress (penised)
>or
Now you know why those people are running the Uni-Versity.
Meta-Physics only works with Empath-y or Aspergers++ people, Autism gets BTFO'd by it, normies are lost in its hyper vague-ness.
So fucking abstract to have almost completely contradictory definitions operating simultaneously.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 09:05:34 UTC No. 16181208
>>16178273
fucking javascript, I swear to christ
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 16:54:47 UTC No. 16181703
>>16178273
Base 1 is just tickmarks:
1
11
111
1111
11111
111111
Etc