๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:54:25 UTC No. 16179079
Theoretical physics is much harder than pure math.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:54:57 UTC No. 16179081
You are a mentally ill deranged subhuman who doesn't knows his place
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:57:20 UTC No. 16179083
>>16179081
>You are a mentally ill deranged subhuman who doesn't knows his place
Cry more shitjeet
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:59:12 UTC No. 16179086
>>16179079
This is true.
Anonymous at Thu, 16 May 2024 23:59:18 UTC No. 16179087
>>16179079
Theoretical physics is pure math. It certainly has nothing to do with material reality.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:08:39 UTC No. 16179099
>>16179079
Kek this would trigger mathfags too hard.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:33:32 UTC No. 16179124
>>16179086
>>16179087
>>16179099
Explain, anons
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:47:57 UTC No. 16179141
>>16179124
Hamilton's principle of least action is an axiomatic assertion from which we base the rest of classical mechanics.
The idea that the "true path" an object takes must correspond to the saddle point on the variational is something we've axiomatically asserted, not something that actually is tied to material reality.
Basically all of theoretical physics corresponds to sets of mathematical axioms that we develop because they "look right" and can never empirically verify because there are always some amount of measurement and process uncertainties.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:49:12 UTC No. 16179144
>>16179079
Agreed.
t. CStranny
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 00:51:50 UTC No. 16179151
9+10=21 , in my theoretical realm.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 05:39:00 UTC No. 16179404
Theoretical physics has copied the mistakes of pure math. As long as physicist don't get rid of "complex numbers" their models will always be wrong.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 May 2024 06:14:45 UTC No. 16179434
>>16179079
As if [math] \mathbb{THE~PHENOTYPE} [/math] wasn't proof of this already