🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 04:11:43 UTC No. 16180952
>>16180946
Next time post this horseshit on x or pol.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 06:51:02 UTC No. 16181136
>>16180952
So you're trying to tell us that you can't dispute it, but you're unwilling to admit to that explicitly
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 08:54:05 UTC No. 16181196
>>16180946
Much of those claims are simply untrue perhaps as many as 100%, screenshots, twitter together with obsession for pol posting.
Consider yourself thusly blown out
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 12:25:13 UTC No. 16181332
>>16181196
Proof that these are untrue? Sounds to me like you're coping.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 14:30:50 UTC No. 16181485
>>16181332
I used the same proof they used to prove them wrong, see the OP source.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 00:15:37 UTC No. 16182173
>>16181485
>I used the same proof they used to prove them wrong
nice cope, but you didn't
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 00:49:25 UTC No. 16182206
>>16181196
Richard Horton:
https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/jour
Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma
Marcia Angell:
Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption
Arnold Relman & Marcia Angell:
https://static.poder360.com.br/2021
America's Other Drug Problem
Looks like you are full of shit my double nigger.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 00:59:25 UTC No. 16182214
>>16180946
2x-x is the real non answer
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 04:52:31 UTC No. 16182364
>>16180946
Lancet actually has the lowest retraction rate of all the major journals, Horton knows what he is talking about when he says that the majority of scientific literature should be tossed in the garbage
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:40:44 UTC No. 16182380
>Can you dispute this?
There is good science and let's say fragmented science. It is actually quite easy to see this when considering virtue ethics.
Good science tries to reveal more truth about the world we live in using the scientific method. The results are shared with the rest of the scientific community with a rigorous process of peer-reviewed journals. In this process a scientist needs funding and status to succeed.
Fragmented or corrupted science is imitating the above process but instead of trying to reveal truth, the goal of the fragmented scientist is to acquire funding and status. In a way he is using fragments of science, not actual science.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:51:56 UTC No. 16183440
>>16181136
yes, exactly
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 19:47:00 UTC No. 16184967
>>16180946
>linus pauling
high school dropout & nobel prize winner
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:19:31 UTC No. 16185639
>>16183440
You should have just been honest to begin with
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 21:42:32 UTC No. 16186815
>>16184967
based, i wish i'd dropped out of school and started working when i was 14 or so, i'd be so much better off now if i had done so