Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 08:46:50 UTC No. 16181194

>>16181190
you just made that one up. No one ever said such a stupid thing.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 09:05:24 UTC No. 16181207

The most enraging pseudo "factoid" is the claim that "complex numbers" were numbers and a reasonable basis for geometry.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 09:48:43 UTC No. 16181235

>>16181190
>There's nothing special about AI, it's just matrix multiplication.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 10:04:16 UTC No. 16181243

>>16181207
thank God for making you retarded

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 10:08:10 UTC No. 16181245

>>16181243
>"complex number" ideologist has no argument
>has to post insult instead
Every time

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 13:12:27 UTC No. 16181395

>>16181190
>>The Universe is infinite
[citation needed]

>>16181235
This but unironically

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 13:16:55 UTC No. 16181399

>>16181190
Did your picrel chud divide by zero?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 13:22:52 UTC No. 16181404

>>16181207
They can be, depending on your definition of "number" and "complex."
In my view, the following are numbers: naturals, integers, finite fields, rationals, complex rationals...
The following are not numbers: "reals" and any other uncomputable or uncountably infinite set.
(By the way, computer floats are a finite subset of rationals, they have nothing to do with "reals")

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 13:23:59 UTC No. 16181407

>>16181235
It turns out that linear algebra was everything we needed.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 13:35:38 UTC No. 16181424

>>16181190
I've only ever heard joe rogan say that.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 17:50:49 UTC No. 16181777

>>16181190
that 0.999... = 1

that gravity is caused by spacetime curvature

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 18:52:06 UTC No. 16181835

>>16181194
look up "Max Tegmark's four levels of multiverses", specifically level 1. it's in wikipedia.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:05:26 UTC No. 16181845

>>16181190
I mean if reality is infinite and beyond our understanding why could that not be theoretically true? There could be an infinite amount of universe beyond our own for all we know.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 21:35:27 UTC No. 16182024

>>16181845
It could be true, but some people say it's necessarily true - that if something is infinite, it must hold an infinite number of permutations of every possible thing. But then you can have infinite sequences like 1,2,1,1,1,1,1.... where there is only one 2 and no 3's. And, for example, if you had an infinite number of chairs you would need an infinitely spacious room to hold them, but that room wouldn't necessarily contain a table.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 22:01:01 UTC No. 16182052

>>16182024
>>16181190
If our universe were actually infinite and its properties were consistent all the way around, then it’s pretty hard to argue that there are NOT infinite planets with water, infinite planets with water that have life, infinite planets with water and intelligent life etc. etc. and even infinite planets where you made this exact post. We don’t really understand infinity because we’ve never experienced it or interacted with it, so we can’t really talk about it

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 23:15:12 UTC No. 16182116

>>16181835
Not reading that shit. But the title already gives it away: The claim that multiverses existed accompanied by the argument that this must mean several versions of 'one self' existed is something entirely different than claiming the (1) universe being infinite would lead to the conclusion of there being infinite versions of one self.
So: No one ever said that shit. Before OP here.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 00:14:48 UTC No. 16182170

>>16181190
>According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way that a bee should be able to fly.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 03:50:43 UTC No. 16182333

>>16182116
so not only are you a faggot, but you are also an illiterate faggot.
how horrifying

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 21:25:51 UTC No. 16183336

>>16181245
that which isn't even wrong deserves nothing but derision