Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 16:00:17 UTC No. 16181613

>>16181532
I have a meme, but I'm not making an image.
>If you flip 100 coins, how many land heads and how many land tails?
>If you flip 100 sardines, how many fish land on their left side and how many land on their right side, and did their death flips matter?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 16:04:03 UTC No. 16181618

>>16181532

The solution to the Trolley Problem is to run over the single person tied to the train tracks, and then back up and run over the second group because it eliminated six economically dependent individuals and doubled the time worked for the tram driver and increased his pay.

bodhi at Sat, 18 May 2024 20:42:57 UTC No. 16181959

>>16181532
>not having your hard drive backed up
disdain

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 20:45:46 UTC No. 16181966

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 21:00:43 UTC No. 16181987

>>16181532
>it is possible to fail in many ways, while to succeed is possible only in one way.
>Aristotle
You pull the lever because you ought to have tried.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 03:00:44 UTC No. 16182300

>>16181966
lel

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 03:02:58 UTC No. 16182302

This isn't science. Take your Voodoo to /x/.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 03:16:49 UTC No. 16182307

>>16182302
you should be able to solve this

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 06:26:09 UTC No. 16182403

>>16182307
If at any point n becomes odd, or if n was initially odd, it just blows up to infinity, because 2n+1 is also odd, right? And unless the initial n is a power of 2, halving it over and over again will eventually reach an odd number that will also blow up to infinity, won't it? am i missing something here?

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:39:43 UTC No. 16182659

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:47:54 UTC No. 16182667

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:50:41 UTC No. 16182671

>>16182403
The image is wrong; for odd numbers it should be multiplied by 3, not 2. The Collatz conjecture is sometimes even referred to as the 3x+1 conjecture.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 12:45:36 UTC No. 16182706

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 23:37:07 UTC No. 16183522

>>16182671
oh, that makes a lot more sense, thanks

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:17:12 UTC No. 16183587

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:18:13 UTC No. 16183591

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:19:31 UTC No. 16183592

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:21:26 UTC No. 16183594

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:22:27 UTC No. 16183596

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:23:37 UTC No. 16183599

this one would be better with only one guy at the bottom track

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:24:41 UTC No. 16183601

and finally, the real solution to the original problem

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:31:50 UTC No. 16183611

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:33:23 UTC No. 16183613

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:35:41 UTC No. 16183618

Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 18:00:32 UTC No. 16184790

>>16183611
this is the one that truly bothers me

Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 06:15:03 UTC No. 16185698

>>16182667
kek

That Joaquin at Tue, 21 May 2024 06:17:41 UTC No. 16185700

>>16184790
Really?

Not saving them just the existential dred of not being you

Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 06:39:31 UTC No. 16185717

>>16181966
lel