Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 18:59:36 UTC No. 16181841

>>16181836
It's not unless you want to teach math to niggers in the future.
Remaining problems are too hard - you have almost zero chance of achieving academic success.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:12:56 UTC No. 16181850

>>16181836
tell AI to solve the navier-stokes problem

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:34:02 UTC No. 16181866

>>16181836
>>16181841
>>16181850
A board full of mongoloids.
One asking dumb questions, the others replying with dumb answers.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:35:00 UTC No. 16181867

>>16181866
Which one is you?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:37:47 UTC No. 16181868

>>16181867
I'm the mongoloid replying with dumb answers, only 1 mongoloid can ask and that's the OP.

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:44:25 UTC No. 16181875

>>16181868
Going to need to see a mathematical proof showing that you're not the OP for this to suffice

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 19:47:22 UTC No. 16181878

Studying pure math is for super-geniuses. Are you?

Anonymous at Sat, 18 May 2024 20:06:17 UTC No. 16181903

AI is crap. In picrelated for example, the AI thinks this is the answer although it hasn't proven it (and it's not the right answer anyway). If AI is so intelligent it could have at least admitted that the problem is too difficult to solve.

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:24:10 UTC No. 16182634

>>16181836
>Is maths worth studying?
no

Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 17:50:07 UTC No. 16183020

>>16182634
Ted is literally retarted in this particular topic, he could have stayed at Berkely and easily become a full professor in under 5 or 10 years max. He unironically could have made a living doing pure mathematics if he didn't go ape shit over technology etc, his statement here makes no sense since he personally pissed away his own academic career.