Image not available

1000x1419

1716092951627577.jpg

๐Ÿงต how to find out between real science and bollocks

Anonymous No. 16182557

its quite simple really: if you can show everything as maths, you deal with real science

if you cant produce math but require WORDS WORDS WORDS instead, its a scam and not science

here is true vs untrue fields

real science:
-maths
-physics
-chem
-biology (biology can be explained by physics and chemistry eventhough we dont have maths for it yet)

shit scam field:
-psychology (doing statistics math doesnt make it science since you cant turn mental illness descriptions into maths the only thing you can do is create excel charts for dumb statistics)
-most of the other fields arent even worth mentioning using the word science, psychology at least tried to research one particular part of biology, that is, human mind which is a biological construct so while psychology is shit it gets honorable mention of at least researching something that exists instead of trying to research something that doesnt exist

Anonymous No. 16182602

>>16182557
>if you can show everything as maths, you deal with real science
You can define whatever you want, and it may work, but it isn't real.

Anonymous No. 16182645

>>16182602
you can talk shit however you want and it doesnt make it real (like psychology)
the only reason psychology keeps it science designation is because governments can use it

Anonymous No. 16182689

>>16182557
>maths
Stopped reading there.

Anonymous No. 16182716

>>16182557
>biology can be explained by physics and chemistry eventhough we dont have maths for it yet
why should it be different from psychology tho:
>psychology can be explained by biology eventhough we dont have maths for it yet
both doesn't have any concrete theory or mathematic formulas to express any bollocks. they're both collecting data and torture them to produce nonsenses (gender are non-binary, anyone?)
the only real sciences are physics and chemistry. math isn't a science, it's above science and is the language sciences are written in. all other fields are pseudoscientific bullshit even though they try really hard to cast themselves as one.

Anonymous No. 16182758

>>16182716
biology vs psychology:

>you can use animal or tree genes and compare them to each other with math to find out how big percentage of DNA code is same for a human and a mouse vs a human and a chimp etc.

then you can build rooted trees of life and try to guess what has evolved from what during 4 billion years of time

but psychology? what does it have?
they claim there is a thing called schizophrenia (1800s invention) and they move goalposts every year on what is schizophrenia symptoms and causes
then tehy also try to claim some genes cause schizophrenia by using statistic and showing "1000 persons with this gene variant had 2% elevated chance of schizophrenia compared to 1000 persons of that other gene variant"

animal biology has a lot more basis on reality

Anonymous No. 16182781

>>16182645
I mean you can define let's say a 6D non-euclidean space and it may work, but it isn't real.

Anonymous No. 16182807

>>16182557
do normies consider her attractive?

Anonymous No. 16182810

>>16182758
>>you can use animal or tree genes and compare them to each other with math to find out how big percentage of DNA code is same for a human and a mouse vs a human and a chimp etc.
>then you can build rooted trees of life and try to guess what has evolved from what during 4 billion years of time
sorry but all of this are just bollock wordcel posturing bullshit research.

Image not available

646x172

genediff.jpg

Anonymous No. 16182923

>>16182810
>biology:
you can compare any gene between all these organisms and see if tey are compatible
nature created them, not man, man is simply looking at the code which was ready made

>psychology:
??? they have literally nothing no mental problem can be measured by any means