Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 10:17:24 UTC No. 16182574
>>16182566
It's not
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 10:30:47 UTC No. 16182589
Gauss and Cauchy ruined it by introducing the dogma of "complex numbers". If we corrected this error math would become much easier and more intuitive.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 10:55:41 UTC No. 16182613
>>16182589
Are you filtered by complex analysis what is your problem with it?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:02:55 UTC No. 16182618
>>16182613
Superficially, one might assume I got filtered. But I prefer to frame it differently. Complex analysis got filtered by me. I exposed how unintuitive and ungeometric it is.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 11:36:23 UTC No. 16182654
>>16182618
skill issue
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 12:02:55 UTC No. 16182676
>>16182566
Because Gödel proved that you can't prove something with its own system or something like that.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 18:07:22 UTC No. 16183049
That just means you're doing it right
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 05:55:52 UTC No. 16183997
>>16182589
0 has been much more ruinous.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 06:04:02 UTC No. 16184009
>>16182618
Buy Complex analysis by Eiderman he has solutions to every problem.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 06:29:33 UTC No. 16184025
>>16182566
Because it's so easy. It's so easy that smart people have made an incredible amount of progress in it, thus it's in a much more developed state than other fields. That means there's a lot more to learn before you can even begin to understand the issues that modern mathematicians are concerned with.
Unless you meant "why is solving basic equations so hard?" in which case the answer is, skill issue.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 06:32:00 UTC No. 16184030
>>16184025
Or OP was talking about hard as in hard/soft instead of hard/easy.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 07:28:18 UTC No. 16184071
>>16182566
Your prefrontal cortex is bad so you suck at it, buy mathematics for physicists by altland and download his solution manual from libgen.rs
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:13:17 UTC No. 16184118
>>16182618
>Superficially, one might assume I got filtered. But I prefer to cope and seethe
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:13:31 UTC No. 16184119
>>16182566
you literally just follow the steps and you can't be wrong. it's the easiest subject there is.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:17:29 UTC No. 16184122
>>16182589
Git Gud, Scrub.
https://youtu.be/blSXTZ3Nihs
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:24:31 UTC No. 16184133
>>16184071
NTA but I have a contused prefrontal cortex from childhood, I have always wanted to be an engineer or scientist of some kind, do I basically have to rote-learn everything?
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 09:26:22 UTC No. 16184204
>>16184071
> Buy a book for physicists to learn math.
Why would you ever do this? This is a terrible way to learn math. You'll come out just as lost and confused as physicists.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 09:53:28 UTC No. 16184225
>>16182676
judeobolshevik gobbledygook
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 20:31:17 UTC No. 16185029
>>16183997
How can nothing ruin anything? Get a grip.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 21:18:15 UTC No. 16185095
>>16182676
Idk sounds pretty serious ong frfr
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 21:46:23 UTC No. 16185127
>>16182618
>t.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 21:51:05 UTC No. 16185132
>>16184071
>buy mathematics for physicists
I think it's time to shut down the physics departments and replace them all with proper mathematicians. They cannot keep getting away with their lack of rigour.